Scholarlink

<p>To date, no systematic review has examined whether adrenalectomy (ADX) or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) treatment is more effective in patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism (uPA). Comparing clinical and biochemical data before and after treatment, we performed a systematic review to determine whether either ADX or MRA treatment is superior to the other in patients with uPA. Article search was performed using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ICHUSHI electronic databases. A comparative analysis was performed when at least 3 articles were available in each outcome. The collected data were used to calculate the effect measures represented as mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR). Our search strategy identified 526 abstracts, of which 7 research papers were finally included in the analysis. ADX for uPA patients significantly reduced the incidence of cerebro-cardiovascular disease (OR 0.63 [95% confidence interval 0.46, 0.85]), lowered the systolic BP (−8.78 mmHg [−11.61, −5.95]), and increased the serum potassium levels (0.43 mmol/L [0.35, 0.51]) compared to MRAs. In conclusion, ADX is more effective than MRA treatment in patients with uPA, but with higher risk of increased serum potassium levels.</p><p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A systematic review to compare adrenalectomy and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月4日

查看全文
  • Yuichi Yoshida,
  • Kenichiro Kinouchi,
  • Satoshi Nagai,
  • Atsushi Sakima,
  • Yoichi Takami,
  • Hisatomi Arima,
  • Kazutoshi Miyashita,
  • Masashi Mukoyama

摘要

To date, no systematic review has examined whether adrenalectomy (ADX) or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) treatment is more effective in patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism (uPA). Comparing clinical and biochemical data before and after treatment, we performed a systematic review to determine whether either ADX or MRA treatment is superior to the other in patients with uPA. Article search was performed using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ICHUSHI electronic databases. A comparative analysis was performed when at least 3 articles were available in each outcome. The collected data were used to calculate the effect measures represented as mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR). Our search strategy identified 526 abstracts, of which 7 research papers were finally included in the analysis. ADX for uPA patients significantly reduced the incidence of cerebro-cardiovascular disease (OR 0.63 [95% confidence interval 0.46, 0.85]), lowered the systolic BP (−8.78 mmHg [−11.61, −5.95]), and increased the serum potassium levels (0.43 mmol/L [0.35, 0.51]) compared to MRAs. In conclusion, ADX is more effective than MRA treatment in patients with uPA, but with higher risk of increased serum potassium levels.