Scholarlink

Objective <p>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the impact of edentulism and denture use on the oral microbiome, focusing on microbial diversity, colonization and biofilm formation in completely and partially edentulous patients.</p> Methods <p>A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases (PubMed-Medline, Scopus, Embase, Lilacs, and Google Scholar) until June 1, 2024. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and cohort studies were included. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment followed PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA and R software with a random effects maximum likelihood model. Microbial co-occurrence networks, heatmaps, and longitudinal trends were analyzed, with heterogeneity assessed using Higgin’s I² (substantial heterogeneity defined as I² &gt; 50%).</p> Results <p>Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. The oral microbiome in edentulous patients differed significantly from dentate individuals, influenced by denture materials, design, and time. Veillonella abundance in acrylic complete dentures was 13.63% (95% CI = -0.04, 27.29), I² = 90.98%, compared to 49.10% (95% CI = -29.62, 115.81), I² = 99.47% in dentate patients. Candida albicans increased over time in acrylic dentures, from 63.13% (95% CI = 48.93, 77.33), I² = 99.84% after insertion to 344.72 CFU/ml × 10² (95% CI = 139.19, 550.24), I² = 98.30% at nine months. Streptococcus mutans in CAD/CAM dentures increased from 45.54 CFU/ml × 10² (95% CI = 33.82, 57.25), I² = 87.26% at three months to 125.22 CFU/ml × 10² (95% CI = 38.25, 212.18), I² = 97.89% at nine months. Co-occurrence networks revealed strong Candida albicans–Streptococcus mutans synergy, while Fusobacterium nucleatum showed antagonistic interactions. Heatmaps demonstrated microbial dysbiosis in denture stomatitis cases, with increased Porphyromonas gingivalis and Candida albicans and reduced commensals. Longitudinal analyses highlighted the progressive dominance of opportunistic pathogens, emphasizing the need for early and consistent hygiene interventions.</p> Conclusion <p>Denture wearers exhibit distinct microbial communities influenced by biofilm formation, denture materials, and hygiene practices. Findings highlight the importance of antimicrobial denture materials and effective cleaning protocols in managing microbial colonization. Given high heterogeneity, standardized methodologies are essential for future research. Frequent professional cleaning and individualized hygiene strategies are necessary to prevent denture-associated infections and maintain oral health.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Dentures and the oral microbiome: Unraveling the hidden impact on edentulous and partially edentulous patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月29日

查看全文
  • Seenivasan Madhan Kumar,
  • Shanmuganathan Natarajan,
  • Sridharan KS,
  • Senthil Kumar Sundarajan,
  • Parthasarathy Natarajan,
  • A. Selva Arockiam

摘要

Objective

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the impact of edentulism and denture use on the oral microbiome, focusing on microbial diversity, colonization and biofilm formation in completely and partially edentulous patients.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases (PubMed-Medline, Scopus, Embase, Lilacs, and Google Scholar) until June 1, 2024. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and cohort studies were included. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment followed PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA and R software with a random effects maximum likelihood model. Microbial co-occurrence networks, heatmaps, and longitudinal trends were analyzed, with heterogeneity assessed using Higgin’s I² (substantial heterogeneity defined as I² > 50%).

Results

Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. The oral microbiome in edentulous patients differed significantly from dentate individuals, influenced by denture materials, design, and time. Veillonella abundance in acrylic complete dentures was 13.63% (95% CI = -0.04, 27.29), I² = 90.98%, compared to 49.10% (95% CI = -29.62, 115.81), I² = 99.47% in dentate patients. Candida albicans increased over time in acrylic dentures, from 63.13% (95% CI = 48.93, 77.33), I² = 99.84% after insertion to 344.72 CFU/ml × 10² (95% CI = 139.19, 550.24), I² = 98.30% at nine months. Streptococcus mutans in CAD/CAM dentures increased from 45.54 CFU/ml × 10² (95% CI = 33.82, 57.25), I² = 87.26% at three months to 125.22 CFU/ml × 10² (95% CI = 38.25, 212.18), I² = 97.89% at nine months. Co-occurrence networks revealed strong Candida albicans–Streptococcus mutans synergy, while Fusobacterium nucleatum showed antagonistic interactions. Heatmaps demonstrated microbial dysbiosis in denture stomatitis cases, with increased Porphyromonas gingivalis and Candida albicans and reduced commensals. Longitudinal analyses highlighted the progressive dominance of opportunistic pathogens, emphasizing the need for early and consistent hygiene interventions.

Conclusion

Denture wearers exhibit distinct microbial communities influenced by biofilm formation, denture materials, and hygiene practices. Findings highlight the importance of antimicrobial denture materials and effective cleaning protocols in managing microbial colonization. Given high heterogeneity, standardized methodologies are essential for future research. Frequent professional cleaning and individualized hygiene strategies are necessary to prevent denture-associated infections and maintain oral health.