Scholarlink

<p>DNA methylation (DNAm) episignature analysis is an emerging tool for diagnosing individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders, congenital anomalies, and growth disorders. We evaluated its clinical utility as a first-tier test in 62 individuals without prior molecular testing. DNAm arrays identified a diagnosis in 30.6% (19/62) of cases. The positivity rate was highest for Fragile X syndrome (100%, 5/5), followed by syndromic disorders (44%, 8/18) and imprinting disorders (25%, 6/24), including Silver-Russell, Beckwith-Wiedemann, and Prader-Willi syndromes. No diagnoses were made in 15 individuals with non-syndromic neurodevelopmental disorders. Alternative diagnoses were identified in 4.8% (3/62) of cases. These findings suggest that DNAm arrays can serve as an effective first-tier diagnostic tool, particularly for syndromic and imprinting disorders, with potential to improve diagnostic efficiency and reduce reliance on sequential genetic testing. While these findings support the use of DNAm arrays as an effective first-tier tool in selected populations, larger, unselected cohort studies are needed to validate its generalizability.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Evaluating DNA methylation episignatures as a first-tier diagnostic test in individuals with suspected genetic disorders

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月3日

查看全文
  • Tinatin Tkemladze,
  • Christopher Campbell,
  • Kakha Bregvadze,
  • Eka Kvaratskhelia,
  • Elene Abzianidze,
  • Leigh Demain,
  • Sarah Jenkinson,
  • Sarah Hilton,
  • Michael Levy,
  • Jennifer Kerkhof,
  • David Gokhale,
  • Bekim Sadikovic,
  • Siddharth Banka

摘要

DNA methylation (DNAm) episignature analysis is an emerging tool for diagnosing individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders, congenital anomalies, and growth disorders. We evaluated its clinical utility as a first-tier test in 62 individuals without prior molecular testing. DNAm arrays identified a diagnosis in 30.6% (19/62) of cases. The positivity rate was highest for Fragile X syndrome (100%, 5/5), followed by syndromic disorders (44%, 8/18) and imprinting disorders (25%, 6/24), including Silver-Russell, Beckwith-Wiedemann, and Prader-Willi syndromes. No diagnoses were made in 15 individuals with non-syndromic neurodevelopmental disorders. Alternative diagnoses were identified in 4.8% (3/62) of cases. These findings suggest that DNAm arrays can serve as an effective first-tier diagnostic tool, particularly for syndromic and imprinting disorders, with potential to improve diagnostic efficiency and reduce reliance on sequential genetic testing. While these findings support the use of DNAm arrays as an effective first-tier tool in selected populations, larger, unselected cohort studies are needed to validate its generalizability.