<p>Digenic inheritance is characterized by the combined alteration of two different genes leading to a disease. It could explain the etiology of many currently undiagnosed rare diseases. With the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the identification of digenic inheritance patterns has become more technically feasible, yet still poses significant challenges without any gold standard method. Here, we present a comprehensive overview of the existing methods developed to detect digenic inheritance in sequencing data and provide a classification in cohort-based and individual-based methods. The latter category of methods appeared the most applicable to rare diseases, especially the ones not needing patient phenotypic description as input. We discuss the availability of the different methods, their output and scalability to inform potential users. Focusing on methods to detect digenic inheritance in the case of very rare or heterogeneous diseases, we propose a benchmark using different real-life scenarios involving known digenic and putative neutral pairs of genes. Among these different methods, DiGePred stood out as the one giving the least number of false positives, ARBOCK as giving the greatest number of true positives, and DIEP as having the best balance between both. By synthesizing the state-of-the-art techniques and providing insights into their practical utility, this benchmark serves as a valuable resource for researchers and clinicians in selecting suitable methodologies for detecting digenic inheritance in a wide range of disorders using sequencing data.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Benchmark of computational methods to detect digenism in sequencing data

  • Marie-Sophie C. Ogloblinsky,
  • Donald F. Conrad,
  • Anaïs Baudot,
  • Elisabeth Tournier-Lasserve,
  • Emmanuelle Génin,
  • Dominique Campion,
  • Jean-François Dartigues,
  • Jean-François Deleuze,
  • Jean-Charles Lambert,
  • Richard Redon,
  • Thomas Ludwig,
  • Benjamin Grenier-Boley,
  • Sébastien Letort,
  • Pierre Lindenbaum,
  • Vincent Meyer,
  • Olivier Quenez,
  • Christian Dina,
  • Céline Bellenguez,
  • Camille Charbonnier-Le Clézio,
  • Joanna Giemza,
  • Stéphanie Chatel,
  • Claude Férec,
  • Hervé Le Marec,
  • Luc Letenneur,
  • Gaël Nicolas,
  • Karen Rouault,
  • Delphine Bacq,
  • Anne Boland,
  • Doris Lechner,
  • Emmanuelle Génin,
  • Gaëlle Marenne

摘要

Digenic inheritance is characterized by the combined alteration of two different genes leading to a disease. It could explain the etiology of many currently undiagnosed rare diseases. With the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the identification of digenic inheritance patterns has become more technically feasible, yet still poses significant challenges without any gold standard method. Here, we present a comprehensive overview of the existing methods developed to detect digenic inheritance in sequencing data and provide a classification in cohort-based and individual-based methods. The latter category of methods appeared the most applicable to rare diseases, especially the ones not needing patient phenotypic description as input. We discuss the availability of the different methods, their output and scalability to inform potential users. Focusing on methods to detect digenic inheritance in the case of very rare or heterogeneous diseases, we propose a benchmark using different real-life scenarios involving known digenic and putative neutral pairs of genes. Among these different methods, DiGePred stood out as the one giving the least number of false positives, ARBOCK as giving the greatest number of true positives, and DIEP as having the best balance between both. By synthesizing the state-of-the-art techniques and providing insights into their practical utility, this benchmark serves as a valuable resource for researchers and clinicians in selecting suitable methodologies for detecting digenic inheritance in a wide range of disorders using sequencing data.