Scholarlink

Background <p>Belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib and dexamethasone (BVd) demonstrated clinical activity in the phase I/II DREAMM-6 (Arm B) study and significant clinical benefit in the phase III DREAMM-7 study for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and ≥1 prior line of therapy.</p> Methods <p>Population pharmacokinetic-derived Cycle 1 (C1) belantamab mafodotin exposures were used to evaluate exposure-efficacy/exposure-safety relationships across multiple doses and schedules for benefit-risk assessment.</p> Results <p>Belantamab mafodotin C1 exposure was positively associated with response endpoints and grade ≥2/ ≥3 ophthalmic exam findings (OEFs), but not grade ≥2/ ≥3 ocular adverse events (oAEs) or best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) worsening to 20/50 or worse in both eyes. Probability of very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) was higher than grade ≥3 oAEs/BCVA worsening in both eyes across C1 exposures; efficacy improved at higher C1 exposures without increased OEF risk. Model-based benefit-risk assessment showed a belantamab mafodotin starting dose of 1.9 mg/kg instead of 2.5 mg/kg would result in lower probability of ≥VGPR without reduction in BCVA worsening in both eyes/grade ≥3 oAEs.</p> Conclusions <p>An initial belantamab mafodotin dose of 2.5 mg/kg for BVd yields deeper responses with minimal change in safety outcomes versus 1.9 mg/kg for patients with RRMM.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Exposure-response analyses for belantamab mafodotin in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma from DREAMM-6 Arm B and DREAMM-7

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月13日

查看全文
  • Theodoros Papathanasiou,
  • Xi Chen,
  • Fernando Carreno,
  • Astrid McKeown,
  • Sumita Roy-Ghanta,
  • Lydia Eccersley,
  • Ravi Kasinathan,
  • Nashita Patel,
  • Geraldine Ferron-Brady

摘要

Background

Belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib and dexamethasone (BVd) demonstrated clinical activity in the phase I/II DREAMM-6 (Arm B) study and significant clinical benefit in the phase III DREAMM-7 study for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and ≥1 prior line of therapy.

Methods

Population pharmacokinetic-derived Cycle 1 (C1) belantamab mafodotin exposures were used to evaluate exposure-efficacy/exposure-safety relationships across multiple doses and schedules for benefit-risk assessment.

Results

Belantamab mafodotin C1 exposure was positively associated with response endpoints and grade ≥2/ ≥3 ophthalmic exam findings (OEFs), but not grade ≥2/ ≥3 ocular adverse events (oAEs) or best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) worsening to 20/50 or worse in both eyes. Probability of very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) was higher than grade ≥3 oAEs/BCVA worsening in both eyes across C1 exposures; efficacy improved at higher C1 exposures without increased OEF risk. Model-based benefit-risk assessment showed a belantamab mafodotin starting dose of 1.9 mg/kg instead of 2.5 mg/kg would result in lower probability of ≥VGPR without reduction in BCVA worsening in both eyes/grade ≥3 oAEs.

Conclusions

An initial belantamab mafodotin dose of 2.5 mg/kg for BVd yields deeper responses with minimal change in safety outcomes versus 1.9 mg/kg for patients with RRMM.