<p><b>Background</b> Community Dental Services and secondary care providers face significant pressures due to the high volume of children referred for treatment. It has been suggested that dentists with special interests could bridge the gap between primary care and specialist services. A Level 2 training programme was designed in Yorkshire and the Humber to equip participants with the knowledge and skills to apply for Level 2 accreditation in paediatric dentistry.</p><p><b>Methods</b> Participants undertaking the first three cohorts of Level 2 training (n = 34) were invited to take part in an anonymised, online, mixed-methods survey. The survey explored how the programme had impacted their knowledge, confidence, and practice in paediatric dentistry, alongside some questions on the participants' background demographics.</p><p><b>Results</b> Participants reported increased frequency and confidence in completing common paediatric dental procedures. They also felt more confident managing paediatric medical and dental conditions and independently handling safeguarding concerns after training. Reference was made to the specialist network created and greater confidence treating Level 2 paediatric patients in general practice, knowing support was available if needed.</p><p><b>Conclusions</b> The Level 2 training programme had a demonstrably positive effect on participants' knowledge and confidence in providing care for Level 2 paediatric patients.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Evaluation of a Level 2 paediatric dentistry training programme: impact on participant experience and confidence

  • Angela Sinadinos,
  • R. James Spencer,
  • Esther McDerra,
  • Paul Leavy,
  • Rachael Nichol

摘要

Background Community Dental Services and secondary care providers face significant pressures due to the high volume of children referred for treatment. It has been suggested that dentists with special interests could bridge the gap between primary care and specialist services. A Level 2 training programme was designed in Yorkshire and the Humber to equip participants with the knowledge and skills to apply for Level 2 accreditation in paediatric dentistry.

Methods Participants undertaking the first three cohorts of Level 2 training (n = 34) were invited to take part in an anonymised, online, mixed-methods survey. The survey explored how the programme had impacted their knowledge, confidence, and practice in paediatric dentistry, alongside some questions on the participants' background demographics.

Results Participants reported increased frequency and confidence in completing common paediatric dental procedures. They also felt more confident managing paediatric medical and dental conditions and independently handling safeguarding concerns after training. Reference was made to the specialist network created and greater confidence treating Level 2 paediatric patients in general practice, knowing support was available if needed.

Conclusions The Level 2 training programme had a demonstrably positive effect on participants' knowledge and confidence in providing care for Level 2 paediatric patients.