Scholarlink

<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have seen remarkable growth in mental health applications over the past few decades, demonstrating significant potential to transform psychiatric care. Despite these advancements, the translation of AI systems into clinical practice remains fraught with challenges. This Perspective examines critical hurdles in psychiatric AI research, emphasizing limitations in research rigor, model reliability, interpretability, clinical utility, and ethical considerations. We argue that a human-assisted AI framework—incorporating incremental feedback, self-adaptation, and dynamic collaboration—can address biases, enhance transparency, and build trust in AI systems. Moreover, initiatives in clinical education, cultural adaptation, and data/software sharing are essential to fostering public engagement, data transparency, and research reproducibility. By focusing on these areas, we aim to bridge the gap between AI potential and its successful, ethical implementation in mental health care, guiding the development of trustworthy, effective, and culturally adaptive AI-powered psychiatric tools.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A cautionary tale for AI and machine learning in psychiatry

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月8日

查看全文
  • Zhe Sage Chen,
  • Katharina Schultebraucks,
  • Wei Wu

摘要

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have seen remarkable growth in mental health applications over the past few decades, demonstrating significant potential to transform psychiatric care. Despite these advancements, the translation of AI systems into clinical practice remains fraught with challenges. This Perspective examines critical hurdles in psychiatric AI research, emphasizing limitations in research rigor, model reliability, interpretability, clinical utility, and ethical considerations. We argue that a human-assisted AI framework—incorporating incremental feedback, self-adaptation, and dynamic collaboration—can address biases, enhance transparency, and build trust in AI systems. Moreover, initiatives in clinical education, cultural adaptation, and data/software sharing are essential to fostering public engagement, data transparency, and research reproducibility. By focusing on these areas, we aim to bridge the gap between AI potential and its successful, ethical implementation in mental health care, guiding the development of trustworthy, effective, and culturally adaptive AI-powered psychiatric tools.