Objective <p>Metacognitive training for psychosis (MCT) targets cognitive biases implicated in the pathogenesis of psychosis, e.g., jumping to conclusions, overconfidence in errors, and inflexibility. This systematic meta-review investigated the current meta-analytic evidence for the effectiveness of MCT with respect to core symptom features in schizophrenia (i.e., positive symptoms, delusions and hallucinations, negative symptoms, and overall psychotic symptoms).</p> Data sources <p>This meta-review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023447442) on July 28, 2023. Articles were searched across five electronic databases from January 1, 2007 to September 1, 2023.</p> Study selection <p>Meta-analyses addressing metacognitive interventions targeting psychotic symptoms were eligible for meta-review.</p> Data extraction and synthesis <p>PRISMA guidelines were followed when applicable. Data extraction was done independently by two authors (AM, AS). A random-effects model was used to pool data within meta-analyses.</p> Main outcomes and measures <p>Main outcomes were levels/severity of positive symptoms, delusions and hallucinations, negative symptoms, and overall psychotic symptoms after intervention.</p> Results <p>Eight meta-analyses and two re-analyses were included for meta-review. A total of eight analyses provided sufficient data for analysis. Significant evidence was found in favor of MCT for positive symptoms (85.71%; <i>N</i> = 35, <i>g</i> = 0.473 [0.295, 0.651], <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 74.64), delusions (60%; <i>N</i> = 24, <i>g</i> = 0.639 [0.389, 0.889], <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 80.01), hallucinations (100%; <i>N</i> = 9, <i>g</i> = 0.265 [0.098, 0.432], <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 6.1), negative symptoms (100%; <i>N</i> = 17, <i>g</i> = 0.233 [0.1, 0.366], <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 34.78), and overall symptoms (50%; <i>N</i> = 37, <i>g</i> = 0.392 [0.245, 0.538], <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 65.73). None of the meta-analyses included a large enough sample size to meet the criteria for ‘suggestive’, ‘convincing’, or ‘highly convincing’ evidence according to <i>metaumbrella.org</i> guidelines (required sample size &gt; 1000 cases). None of the meta-analyses scored ‘moderate’ or ‘high’ on methodological quality. Meta-analyses with significant results were more recent and/or considered more primary studies.</p> Conclusions and relevance <p>There is consistent evidence that MCT ameliorates positive symptoms and delusions in schizophrenia.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Metacognitive training for psychosis (MCT): a systematic meta-review of its effectiveness

  • Antonia Meinhart,
  • Geneviève Sauvé,
  • Annika Schmueser,
  • Danielle Penney,
  • Fabrice Berna,
  • Łukasz Gawęda,
  • Maria Lamarca,
  • Steffen Moritz,
  • Susana Ochoa,
  • Caroline König,
  • Vanessa Acuña,
  • Rabea Fischer

摘要

Objective

Metacognitive training for psychosis (MCT) targets cognitive biases implicated in the pathogenesis of psychosis, e.g., jumping to conclusions, overconfidence in errors, and inflexibility. This systematic meta-review investigated the current meta-analytic evidence for the effectiveness of MCT with respect to core symptom features in schizophrenia (i.e., positive symptoms, delusions and hallucinations, negative symptoms, and overall psychotic symptoms).

Data sources

This meta-review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023447442) on July 28, 2023. Articles were searched across five electronic databases from January 1, 2007 to September 1, 2023.

Study selection

Meta-analyses addressing metacognitive interventions targeting psychotic symptoms were eligible for meta-review.

Data extraction and synthesis

PRISMA guidelines were followed when applicable. Data extraction was done independently by two authors (AM, AS). A random-effects model was used to pool data within meta-analyses.

Main outcomes and measures

Main outcomes were levels/severity of positive symptoms, delusions and hallucinations, negative symptoms, and overall psychotic symptoms after intervention.

Results

Eight meta-analyses and two re-analyses were included for meta-review. A total of eight analyses provided sufficient data for analysis. Significant evidence was found in favor of MCT for positive symptoms (85.71%; N = 35, g = 0.473 [0.295, 0.651], I2 = 74.64), delusions (60%; N = 24, g = 0.639 [0.389, 0.889], I2 = 80.01), hallucinations (100%; N = 9, g = 0.265 [0.098, 0.432], I2 = 6.1), negative symptoms (100%; N = 17, g = 0.233 [0.1, 0.366], I2 = 34.78), and overall symptoms (50%; N = 37, g = 0.392 [0.245, 0.538], I2 = 65.73). None of the meta-analyses included a large enough sample size to meet the criteria for ‘suggestive’, ‘convincing’, or ‘highly convincing’ evidence according to metaumbrella.org guidelines (required sample size > 1000 cases). None of the meta-analyses scored ‘moderate’ or ‘high’ on methodological quality. Meta-analyses with significant results were more recent and/or considered more primary studies.

Conclusions and relevance

There is consistent evidence that MCT ameliorates positive symptoms and delusions in schizophrenia.