<p>The genetic architecture of sporadic Early-Onset Alzheimer Disease (sEOAD, onset ≤65 years) remains largely unknown. To assess the de novo mutation (DNM) hypothesis, we performed a nationwide recruitment of 37 novel sEOAD patients–unaffected parents trios. After assessing known monogenic genes, we performed trio-based exome sequencing and jointly analyzed novel trios with 12 previously reported ones. Of these, we selected 16 trios for genome sequencing. We identified three patients with a pathogenic DNM in <i>APP</i> or <i>PSEN1</i>. Then, from the 46 remaining trios, we identified 38 non-synonymous coding DNM and 4 de novo copy number variants (CNVs) in exome data. Four DNM (2 novel, in <i>SPHK2</i> and <i>DDR1</i>) and bi-allelic inherited variants in two genes affected Alzheimer disease-related genes. No significant burden of rare coding variants in exome/genome data from 5643 EOAD cases and 16097 controls was identified using nested windows centered on each DNM position, at the transcript level. From genome data, one non-coding DNM was predicted to affect splicing in an AD-associated gene, <i>PINX1</i>. Overall, 48% probands carried ≥1 inherited risk factor with odds ratio (OR) &gt; 1.5 and GWAS-defined Genetic Risk Scores (GRS) distribution was more consistent with random distribution than enrichment in higher scores in probands. We confirm that DNMs in known monogenic genes explain sEOAD in a minority of cases, while candidate DNMs in other genes might account for a small proportion of additional cases. The majority of sEOAD patients may have a complex etiology including multiple inherited variants, however, GRS might not explain most of its genetic component.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Assessing the de novo paradigm in sporadic early-onset Alzheimer disease trios

  • Aline Zarea,
  • Kevin Cassinari,
  • François Lecoquierre,
  • Olivier Quenez,
  • Camille Charbonnier,
  • Catherine Schramm,
  • Morgane Lacour,
  • Stéphane Rousseau,
  • Anne-Claire Richard,
  • Anne Rovelet-Lecrux,
  • Magalie Lecourtois,
  • Robert Olaso,
  • Anne Boland,
  • Jean-François Deleuze,
  • Christian Gilissen,
  • Joris A. Veltman,
  • Lisenka ELM Vissers,
  • Céline Bellenguez,
  • Orio Dols-Icardo,
  • John Hardy,
  • Henne Holstege,
  • Marc Hulsman,
  • Jean-Charles Lambert,
  • Simon Mead,
  • Alfredo Ramirez,
  • Rebecca Sims,
  • John van Swieten,
  • Michael Wagner,
  • Julie Williams,
  • Stéphanie Bombois,
  • Claire Boutoleau-Bretonniere,
  • Ludivine Charmard-Witkowski,
  • Vincent de la Sayette,
  • Vincent Deramecourt,
  • Frédérique Etcharry-Bouyx,
  • Audrey Gabelle,
  • Claude Gueriot,
  • Gwenaël Le Guyader,
  • Isabelle Le Ber,
  • Thibaud Lebouvier,
  • Olivier Martinaud,
  • Agnès Michon,
  • Chloé Quelin,
  • Marie Sarazin,
  • Mathieu Sévin,
  • Christel Thauvin-Robinet,
  • David Wallon,
  • Gaël Nicolas

摘要

The genetic architecture of sporadic Early-Onset Alzheimer Disease (sEOAD, onset ≤65 years) remains largely unknown. To assess the de novo mutation (DNM) hypothesis, we performed a nationwide recruitment of 37 novel sEOAD patients–unaffected parents trios. After assessing known monogenic genes, we performed trio-based exome sequencing and jointly analyzed novel trios with 12 previously reported ones. Of these, we selected 16 trios for genome sequencing. We identified three patients with a pathogenic DNM in APP or PSEN1. Then, from the 46 remaining trios, we identified 38 non-synonymous coding DNM and 4 de novo copy number variants (CNVs) in exome data. Four DNM (2 novel, in SPHK2 and DDR1) and bi-allelic inherited variants in two genes affected Alzheimer disease-related genes. No significant burden of rare coding variants in exome/genome data from 5643 EOAD cases and 16097 controls was identified using nested windows centered on each DNM position, at the transcript level. From genome data, one non-coding DNM was predicted to affect splicing in an AD-associated gene, PINX1. Overall, 48% probands carried ≥1 inherited risk factor with odds ratio (OR) > 1.5 and GWAS-defined Genetic Risk Scores (GRS) distribution was more consistent with random distribution than enrichment in higher scores in probands. We confirm that DNMs in known monogenic genes explain sEOAD in a minority of cases, while candidate DNMs in other genes might account for a small proportion of additional cases. The majority of sEOAD patients may have a complex etiology including multiple inherited variants, however, GRS might not explain most of its genetic component.