Scholarlink

<p>As artificial womb technology (AWT) nears clinical translation for extreme prematurity, ethical interest has grown. To characterize this ethical landscape, we conducted a scoping review of ethical considerations of AWT searching Medline, Embase, and Web-of-Science through March 2025. Ethical considerations were extracted and organized using thematic analysis. In total, 247 papers were included: 114 (46.2%) focused on AWT for extreme prematurity and 133 (53.8%) on futuristic complete ectogenesis. Most papers were authored by bioethics scholars (157/247, 63.5%), and within this group, the majority addressed complete ectogenesis (98/157, 62.4%). Seven thematic categories were identified: Benefits and Harm; Decision-making; Moral and Legal Status; Justice and Access; Cultural and Societal Perspectives; Research Ethics and Speculative Concerns. Overall, AWT ethics literature is divided between concerns about “complete ectogenesis” and use for extreme prematurity. Insights from clinically focused literature and comprehensive stakeholder engagement are essential for ethical guidance of impending clinical translation of AWT.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Artificial womb technology; a scoping review of ethical considerations

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月13日

查看全文
  • Felix R. De Bie,
  • Jennifer Paul,
  • Janet Malek,
  • Sharla Rent,
  • E. J. T. Verweij,
  • Joseph Church,
  • Juliana Gebb,
  • Elliott Weiss,
  • Brian W. Gray,
  • Hannah Johnston,
  • Corin Nava,
  • Katrina Moline,
  • Ryan M. Antiel

摘要

As artificial womb technology (AWT) nears clinical translation for extreme prematurity, ethical interest has grown. To characterize this ethical landscape, we conducted a scoping review of ethical considerations of AWT searching Medline, Embase, and Web-of-Science through March 2025. Ethical considerations were extracted and organized using thematic analysis. In total, 247 papers were included: 114 (46.2%) focused on AWT for extreme prematurity and 133 (53.8%) on futuristic complete ectogenesis. Most papers were authored by bioethics scholars (157/247, 63.5%), and within this group, the majority addressed complete ectogenesis (98/157, 62.4%). Seven thematic categories were identified: Benefits and Harm; Decision-making; Moral and Legal Status; Justice and Access; Cultural and Societal Perspectives; Research Ethics and Speculative Concerns. Overall, AWT ethics literature is divided between concerns about “complete ectogenesis” and use for extreme prematurity. Insights from clinically focused literature and comprehensive stakeholder engagement are essential for ethical guidance of impending clinical translation of AWT.