Background <p>Training with high-technology manikins improves cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skill retention, but a checklist to assess both technical and non-technical skills is lacking. This study aimed to develop a standardized checklist to evaluate healthcare’s performance during simulated Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) scenarios.</p> Materials and methods <p>Twenty-two international neonatal resuscitation experts participated in a two-step modified Delphi process, rating each checklist item on a scale of 1–5 and providing feedback. Items with a mean rating below 4 or receiving comments were reviewed. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the final tool was assessed using video-recordings of simulated scenarios.</p> Results <p>The final checklist, validated by 15 experts, includes 33 items. Mean expert rating of all items was 4.35. The checklist showed moderate inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.67) overall, with excellent reliability (ICC = 0.8) for technical skills.</p> Conclusion <p>The tool effectively evaluates technical skills but requires further refinement for non-technical skills assessment.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

NeoScore: a new tool to assess technical and non-technical skills during neonatal resuscitation

  • Leonardo Meggiolaro,
  • Gary Weiner,
  • Alex Staffler,
  • Fiorenzo Lupi,
  • Tommaso Canesso,
  • Daniele Trevisanuto

摘要

Background

Training with high-technology manikins improves cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skill retention, but a checklist to assess both technical and non-technical skills is lacking. This study aimed to develop a standardized checklist to evaluate healthcare’s performance during simulated Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) scenarios.

Materials and methods

Twenty-two international neonatal resuscitation experts participated in a two-step modified Delphi process, rating each checklist item on a scale of 1–5 and providing feedback. Items with a mean rating below 4 or receiving comments were reviewed. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the final tool was assessed using video-recordings of simulated scenarios.

Results

The final checklist, validated by 15 experts, includes 33 items. Mean expert rating of all items was 4.35. The checklist showed moderate inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.67) overall, with excellent reliability (ICC = 0.8) for technical skills.

Conclusion

The tool effectively evaluates technical skills but requires further refinement for non-technical skills assessment.