<p>This study aimed to compare the inter-arm blood pressure difference (IAD) based on the first reading versus the average of the second and the third readings using computer-programmed blood pressure measurement (CCBPM) in 3067 rural community residents. The detection rate of abnormal systolic IAD (sIAD) was 9.1% based on the first reading, compared to 5.6% based on the average reading—a difference of approximately 40%. These findings suggest that CCBPM should be used with the average of the second and the third readings for sIAD evaluation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Interal-arm blood pressure difference with computer-programmed blood pressure measurement: difference between the first reading and the average of the second and the third readings

  • Song Huang,
  • Yu Jin,
  • Jinsong Xu,
  • Jinyin Tong,
  • Hai Su

摘要

This study aimed to compare the inter-arm blood pressure difference (IAD) based on the first reading versus the average of the second and the third readings using computer-programmed blood pressure measurement (CCBPM) in 3067 rural community residents. The detection rate of abnormal systolic IAD (sIAD) was 9.1% based on the first reading, compared to 5.6% based on the average reading—a difference of approximately 40%. These findings suggest that CCBPM should be used with the average of the second and the third readings for sIAD evaluation.