<p>We study <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{CNZ}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mtext>CNZ</mtext> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> properties of rings in a more general setting by introducing the concept of <i>t</i>-<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{CNZ}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mtext>CNZ</mtext> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> rings, defined via a ring tripotent, and investigating their properties. We prove that every <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{CNZ}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mtext>CNZ</mtext> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> ring is a <i>t</i>-<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{CNZ}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mtext>CNZ</mtext> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> ring, but the converse fails, as we demonstrate by a counterexample. Additional examples and counterexamples are provided to illustrate these results. Moreover, we examine <i>t</i>-<InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{CNZ}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mtext>CNZ</mtext> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> properties of rings relative to a ring endomorphism <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>α</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Some results on reversible rings, <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{CNZ}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mtext>CNZ</mtext> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> rings and <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>α</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-skew <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{CNZ}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mtext>CNZ</mtext> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> rings are extended and unified (see [<CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>, <CitationRef CitationID="CR2">2</CitationRef>] and [<CitationRef CitationID="CR4">4</CitationRef>]).</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Zero commutativity of nilpotent elements via tripotents

  • Liang Zhao,
  • Haiyun Wu

摘要

We study \(\textrm{CNZ}\) CNZ properties of rings in a more general setting by introducing the concept of t- \(\textrm{CNZ}\) CNZ rings, defined via a ring tripotent, and investigating their properties. We prove that every \(\textrm{CNZ}\) CNZ ring is a t- \(\textrm{CNZ}\) CNZ ring, but the converse fails, as we demonstrate by a counterexample. Additional examples and counterexamples are provided to illustrate these results. Moreover, we examine t- \(\textrm{CNZ}\) CNZ properties of rings relative to a ring endomorphism \(\alpha \) α . Some results on reversible rings, \(\textrm{CNZ}\) CNZ rings and \(\alpha \) α -skew \(\textrm{CNZ}\) CNZ rings are extended and unified (see [1, 2] and [4]).