<p>More exposure assessment and epidemiological studies are needed for PM<sub>1</sub>, a health-relevant but understudied pollutant, to better understand and mitigate its health risks. This study conducted a 3.5-year PM<sub>1</sub> monitoring campaign in a mountainous community, where air pollutants are more easily trapped, using research-grade low-cost sensors, namely, AS-LUNG-O sets. Nine solar-powered AS-LUNG-O sets were installed at street level, with an additional unit positioned 10&#xa0;m above the ground to serve as an ambient reference. Street-level sensors were placed 3–5&#xa0;m from potential sources such as traffic, temples, and vendors. During the 3.5-year period, the overall mean PM<sub>1</sub> concentration across the nine street-level locations was 20.9 ± 11.0&#xa0;μg/m<sup>3</sup>, compared to 17.0 ± 8.4&#xa0;μg/m<sup>3</sup> at the elevated site. PM<sub>1</sub> levels were typically higher in winter and on religious days across all locations. Spatial analysis revealed that PM<sub>1</sub> hot spots varied by season, day of the week (weekday vs. weekend), and event type (religious vs. typical days). These hot spots were commonly located near traffic sources, temples, and markets. Notably, most of the maximum PM<sub>1</sub> values across the ten locations occurred on weekdays and typical days, highlighting the unpredictable nature of PM<sub>1</sub> levels influenced by community events. Source contributions to PM<sub>1</sub> were estimated using a generalized additive mixed model; the PM<sub>1</sub> contribution from religious events, traffic, and vendors reached statistical significance. The identified hot spots and source contributions can inform targeted control strategies addressing local pollution sources. This study offers a more representative assessment of PM<sub>1</sub> exposure for local residents than data from ambient monitoring stations or short-term monitoring campaigns. The methodology presented can also be applied in other countries to support community-based PM<sub>1</sub> studies.</p> Graphical abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

PM1 Source Evaluation with 3.5 Years of Monitoring in Central Taiwan Using Research-grade Low-cost Sensors

  • Shih-Chun Candice Lung,
  • Tzu-Chi Chieh,
  • Li-Te Chang,
  • Chun-Hu Liu,
  • Ming-Chien Mark Tsou,
  • Tzu-Yao Julia Wen

摘要

More exposure assessment and epidemiological studies are needed for PM1, a health-relevant but understudied pollutant, to better understand and mitigate its health risks. This study conducted a 3.5-year PM1 monitoring campaign in a mountainous community, where air pollutants are more easily trapped, using research-grade low-cost sensors, namely, AS-LUNG-O sets. Nine solar-powered AS-LUNG-O sets were installed at street level, with an additional unit positioned 10 m above the ground to serve as an ambient reference. Street-level sensors were placed 3–5 m from potential sources such as traffic, temples, and vendors. During the 3.5-year period, the overall mean PM1 concentration across the nine street-level locations was 20.9 ± 11.0 μg/m3, compared to 17.0 ± 8.4 μg/m3 at the elevated site. PM1 levels were typically higher in winter and on religious days across all locations. Spatial analysis revealed that PM1 hot spots varied by season, day of the week (weekday vs. weekend), and event type (religious vs. typical days). These hot spots were commonly located near traffic sources, temples, and markets. Notably, most of the maximum PM1 values across the ten locations occurred on weekdays and typical days, highlighting the unpredictable nature of PM1 levels influenced by community events. Source contributions to PM1 were estimated using a generalized additive mixed model; the PM1 contribution from religious events, traffic, and vendors reached statistical significance. The identified hot spots and source contributions can inform targeted control strategies addressing local pollution sources. This study offers a more representative assessment of PM1 exposure for local residents than data from ambient monitoring stations or short-term monitoring campaigns. The methodology presented can also be applied in other countries to support community-based PM1 studies.

Graphical abstract