Scholarlink

Objective <p>This study aimed to introduce and validate a novel classification system for post-reduction distal radius fractures managed conservatively, assessing its predictive value on outcomes and prognosis, while enhancing efficiency and standardizing treatment protocols. Additionally, the study investigated the association between radiographic deformities and adverse clinical outcomes.</p> Methods <p>A retrospective study enrolled 656 patients aged 50&#xa0;years or older with non-operatively managed distal radius fractures. At 6&#xa0;weeks post-fracture, patients underwent radiographic assessments and completed surveys, including Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), SF-12 for health-related quality of life, and satisfaction surveys. Radiographic indices were correlated with patient-reported outcomes using univariate and multivariate regression analyses, with the DASH score as the primary outcome measure. A novel classification system, termed “Muzzammil’s classification of post-reduction distal radius fractures,” was introduced.</p> Results <p>Of the 656 patients (mean age 58.5&#xa0;years, primarily female), 32.16% exhibited acceptable radiographic deformity (Class I). Among the Class II fractures, 19.05% exhibited unacceptable radial inclination or height (Class II (R)), 15.70% demonstrated unacceptable volar or dorsal tilt (Class II (T)), and 9.90% displayed unacceptable intra-articular step-off (Class II (S)). 23.17% had fractures classified as Class III, indicating a combination of unacceptable features. The mean DASH score for Class I fractures was 20 ± 15, compared to higher scores for Class II and III fractures, indicating worse outcomes. SF-12 PCS and MCS scores were similarly better for Class I fractures. Satisfaction rates were highest in Class I (83%) and lowest in Class III (67%). The classification system showed high intra-observer reproducibility among orthopedic and radiology consultants.</p> Conclusion <p>The study introduces Muzzammil’s Post-Reduction Distal Radius Fracture Classification as a novel system with significant potential to improve patient outcome prediction and standardize treatment protocols for conservatively managed distal radius fractures in older adults. While the results suggest strong associations between the classification and patient outcomes, it is important to acknowledge that these findings are preliminary. The classification represents a promising tool rather than a definitive advancement.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Forecasting recovery: introducing Muzzammil’s post-reduction distal radius fracture classification for enhanced patient outcome prediction

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月4日

查看全文
  • Muhammad Muzzammil,
  • Syed Ghulam Mujtaba Shah,
  • Abdul Qadir,
  • Syed Jahanzeb,
  • Shehroz Bashir,
  • Sana Dur Muhammad,
  • Muhammad Owais Minhas,
  • Amna Jamil

摘要

Objective

This study aimed to introduce and validate a novel classification system for post-reduction distal radius fractures managed conservatively, assessing its predictive value on outcomes and prognosis, while enhancing efficiency and standardizing treatment protocols. Additionally, the study investigated the association between radiographic deformities and adverse clinical outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective study enrolled 656 patients aged 50 years or older with non-operatively managed distal radius fractures. At 6 weeks post-fracture, patients underwent radiographic assessments and completed surveys, including Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), SF-12 for health-related quality of life, and satisfaction surveys. Radiographic indices were correlated with patient-reported outcomes using univariate and multivariate regression analyses, with the DASH score as the primary outcome measure. A novel classification system, termed “Muzzammil’s classification of post-reduction distal radius fractures,” was introduced.

Results

Of the 656 patients (mean age 58.5 years, primarily female), 32.16% exhibited acceptable radiographic deformity (Class I). Among the Class II fractures, 19.05% exhibited unacceptable radial inclination or height (Class II (R)), 15.70% demonstrated unacceptable volar or dorsal tilt (Class II (T)), and 9.90% displayed unacceptable intra-articular step-off (Class II (S)). 23.17% had fractures classified as Class III, indicating a combination of unacceptable features. The mean DASH score for Class I fractures was 20 ± 15, compared to higher scores for Class II and III fractures, indicating worse outcomes. SF-12 PCS and MCS scores were similarly better for Class I fractures. Satisfaction rates were highest in Class I (83%) and lowest in Class III (67%). The classification system showed high intra-observer reproducibility among orthopedic and radiology consultants.

Conclusion

The study introduces Muzzammil’s Post-Reduction Distal Radius Fracture Classification as a novel system with significant potential to improve patient outcome prediction and standardize treatment protocols for conservatively managed distal radius fractures in older adults. While the results suggest strong associations between the classification and patient outcomes, it is important to acknowledge that these findings are preliminary. The classification represents a promising tool rather than a definitive advancement.