Scholarlink

<p>In South African cities, participatory governance processes are often turned into procedural formalism and tokenism elements, which further perpetuate legacies of exclusionary planning practice instead of co-production. The concept of placemaking is regularly theorised as a spatial design methodology, while its governance elements remain underexplored. This paper examines how placemaking activities result in participatory governance innovation, drawing on the experiences of an urban intermediary organisation, the Greater Tygerberg Partnership (GTP) from Bellville, Cape Town, South Africa. The study used a qualitative instrumental case study design grounded in collaborative inquiry, using data from semi-structured interviews with participants ranging from GTP staff, ordinary community members, and City of Cape Town officials. The findings identified characteristics such as co-design and co-stewardship elements, adaptive governance through tactical experimentation, and governance arrangements that live beyond the project cycle, being at the core of how GTP’s placemaking processes reconfigure participatory governance. The study also identified structural constraints that come with GTP being an intermediary organisation with primary financial dependence on the local government, when it comes to expanding participation beyond procedural consultation. These findings contribute to the theorisation of participatory governance innovation within placemaking processes that has implication on urban governance reform in South African cities.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Placemaking as a participatory governance innovation for equitable urban futures in South African cities

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月24日

查看全文
  • Thendo Mafame,
  • Anele Horn,
  • Noorudeen Roman,
  • Warren Hewitt,
  • Maxwell Djeco

摘要

In South African cities, participatory governance processes are often turned into procedural formalism and tokenism elements, which further perpetuate legacies of exclusionary planning practice instead of co-production. The concept of placemaking is regularly theorised as a spatial design methodology, while its governance elements remain underexplored. This paper examines how placemaking activities result in participatory governance innovation, drawing on the experiences of an urban intermediary organisation, the Greater Tygerberg Partnership (GTP) from Bellville, Cape Town, South Africa. The study used a qualitative instrumental case study design grounded in collaborative inquiry, using data from semi-structured interviews with participants ranging from GTP staff, ordinary community members, and City of Cape Town officials. The findings identified characteristics such as co-design and co-stewardship elements, adaptive governance through tactical experimentation, and governance arrangements that live beyond the project cycle, being at the core of how GTP’s placemaking processes reconfigure participatory governance. The study also identified structural constraints that come with GTP being an intermediary organisation with primary financial dependence on the local government, when it comes to expanding participation beyond procedural consultation. These findings contribute to the theorisation of participatory governance innovation within placemaking processes that has implication on urban governance reform in South African cities.