<p>Coastal geoheritage in West Africa remains under-documented and under-managed despite rapid shoreline change and growing geotourism demand. We develop a replicable, risk-informed framework to evaluate and prioritize geosites in Popenguine, Senegal. We combine stratigraphic and structural field analysis, multi-criteria geohazard mapping (slope, lineaments, lithology, drainage density, NDVI), and quantitative geoheritage scoring (Brilha, IELIG) with min-max score standardization for site-to-site comparison. Seven geosites show high scientific, educational, and touristic value, with Cap Rouge and Cap de Naze most exposed to marine erosion and structural instability, and carbonate sectors most prone to karst collapse. Normalized IELIG protection priorities align with Brilha vulnerability classes for high-risk sites, while diverging for low-access areas (e.g., Islet, Lagoon). We provide a transferable, community-engaged workflow (data sources, weights, thresholds, and validation steps) that supports immediate protection actions and a longer-term management model for coastal geoheritage in West Africa.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Risk informed geoheritage assessment and coastal management framework for Popenguine Senegal

  • Cheikh Ibrahima Youm,
  • Ibrahima Dia,
  • Bocar Sy,
  • Mourtada Fall,
  • El Hadj Ousmane Sambe,
  • Boubacar Diallo

摘要

Coastal geoheritage in West Africa remains under-documented and under-managed despite rapid shoreline change and growing geotourism demand. We develop a replicable, risk-informed framework to evaluate and prioritize geosites in Popenguine, Senegal. We combine stratigraphic and structural field analysis, multi-criteria geohazard mapping (slope, lineaments, lithology, drainage density, NDVI), and quantitative geoheritage scoring (Brilha, IELIG) with min-max score standardization for site-to-site comparison. Seven geosites show high scientific, educational, and touristic value, with Cap Rouge and Cap de Naze most exposed to marine erosion and structural instability, and carbonate sectors most prone to karst collapse. Normalized IELIG protection priorities align with Brilha vulnerability classes for high-risk sites, while diverging for low-access areas (e.g., Islet, Lagoon). We provide a transferable, community-engaged workflow (data sources, weights, thresholds, and validation steps) that supports immediate protection actions and a longer-term management model for coastal geoheritage in West Africa.