Scholarlink

<p>This article presents the criminalization process of asset appropriation through computer networks and electronic means in Vietnam by analyzing the theory of criminalization, the constituent elements of the offence, and the way in which the legal characteristics and criminal liability of this crime are reflected in criminal law, with particular emphasis on Article 290 of the 2015 Penal Code. Based on the classification of cybercrime and the theory of criminal elements, the article evaluates the strengths and limitations of Vietnam’s means-based model in comparison with the target-based model, and proposes adjustments to legislative techniques, the proportionality of penalties, and enforcement conditions in order to enhance the clarity, proportionality, and feasibility of criminal-law provisions. The article also offers experience and lessons for the domestic incorporation of international legal frameworks on combating cybercrime in general, and the recently adopted United Nations international convention against cybercrime, for a range of countries and territories in addressing cybercrime.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Criminalizing misappropriation of property via computer networks and electronic means in Vietnam

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月5日

查看全文
  • Dinh The Hung

摘要

This article presents the criminalization process of asset appropriation through computer networks and electronic means in Vietnam by analyzing the theory of criminalization, the constituent elements of the offence, and the way in which the legal characteristics and criminal liability of this crime are reflected in criminal law, with particular emphasis on Article 290 of the 2015 Penal Code. Based on the classification of cybercrime and the theory of criminal elements, the article evaluates the strengths and limitations of Vietnam’s means-based model in comparison with the target-based model, and proposes adjustments to legislative techniques, the proportionality of penalties, and enforcement conditions in order to enhance the clarity, proportionality, and feasibility of criminal-law provisions. The article also offers experience and lessons for the domestic incorporation of international legal frameworks on combating cybercrime in general, and the recently adopted United Nations international convention against cybercrime, for a range of countries and territories in addressing cybercrime.