<p>Can you teach schoolchildren to be kinder? We conducted a randomized controlled trial of Learn Kind—a kindness-based SEL curriculum for grades K-8, designed by kindness.org. Teachers—randomly assigned to either a treatment group, or a waitlist group—completed measures and questions (kindness grades, happiness, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, math and reading grades) reporting on approximately 1202 students at three time points (Time 1–Time 3). We found, first: from Time 1–2, the treatment group significantly improved on all measures (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\overline{\text{d} }\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 0.38); the waitlist group did not significantly improve on any measure (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\overline{\text{d} }\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 0.03); and the treatment group improved on all measures significantly more than the waitlist group (<InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\overline{\text{d} }\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 0.34). Second, the improvements in the treatment group on all measures (except 'attention') persisted from Time 2–3 (<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\overline{\text{d} }\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 0.01); and on all measures the treatment group had improved Time 1–3 (<InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\overline{\text{d} }\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 0.38). Third, from Time 2–3 the waitlist group improved significantly on happiness, emotions, and reading (<InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\overline{\text{d} }\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 0.09), but improved significantly more than the treatment group only on emotions and attention (<InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\overline{\text{d} }\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 0.08). Taken together, the study found that Learn Kind had a small positive effect on kindness, happiness, strengths and difficulties, and academic performance. The implications, limitations, and future directions of this research are discussed.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Learn Kind: a cluster randomized controlled trial

  • Mehmet Necip Tunç,
  • Chloe San Miguel,
  • Megan Peterson,
  • Rebecca Reed,
  • Jaclyn Lindsey,
  • Oliver Scott Curry

摘要

Can you teach schoolchildren to be kinder? We conducted a randomized controlled trial of Learn Kind—a kindness-based SEL curriculum for grades K-8, designed by kindness.org. Teachers—randomly assigned to either a treatment group, or a waitlist group—completed measures and questions (kindness grades, happiness, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, math and reading grades) reporting on approximately 1202 students at three time points (Time 1–Time 3). We found, first: from Time 1–2, the treatment group significantly improved on all measures ( \(\overline{\text{d} }\)  = 0.38); the waitlist group did not significantly improve on any measure ( \(\overline{\text{d} }\)  = 0.03); and the treatment group improved on all measures significantly more than the waitlist group ( \(\overline{\text{d} }\)  = 0.34). Second, the improvements in the treatment group on all measures (except 'attention') persisted from Time 2–3 ( \(\overline{\text{d} }\)  = 0.01); and on all measures the treatment group had improved Time 1–3 ( \(\overline{\text{d} }\)  = 0.38). Third, from Time 2–3 the waitlist group improved significantly on happiness, emotions, and reading ( \(\overline{\text{d} }\)  = 0.09), but improved significantly more than the treatment group only on emotions and attention ( \(\overline{\text{d} }\)  = 0.08). Taken together, the study found that Learn Kind had a small positive effect on kindness, happiness, strengths and difficulties, and academic performance. The implications, limitations, and future directions of this research are discussed.