Scholarlink

<p>In this response to de Melo-Martín’s insightful comments on <i>Scientific Testimony</i>, I consider whether reported skepticism about a factual scientific hypothesis reflects genuine attitudes toward it or merely negative attitudes toward an associated policy. On the basis of this discussion, I draw some lessons about policy-relevant science communication and try to articulate them in the form of a principle.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Selective uptake and science communication. Response to de Melo-Martín

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月21日

查看全文
  • Mikkel Gerken

摘要

In this response to de Melo-Martín’s insightful comments on Scientific Testimony, I consider whether reported skepticism about a factual scientific hypothesis reflects genuine attitudes toward it or merely negative attitudes toward an associated policy. On the basis of this discussion, I draw some lessons about policy-relevant science communication and try to articulate them in the form of a principle.