Scholarlink

Objectives <p>To evaluate recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on mindfulness meditation in clinical settings to assess effects on pain reduction, mobility, quality of life, and physical function in patients with chronic lower-back pain (CLBP).</p> Methods <p>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a literature search was conducted using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) framework. Mindfulness meditation was compared to control or usual care. Data from RCTs published between January 2010 and January 2025 were extracted from Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Studies were selected following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines; risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2) tool. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan). Mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for outcomes such as pain intensity, physical function, and quality of life. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Forest plots summarized effect sizes, and funnel plots assessed publication bias.</p> Results <p>Of 204 identified citations, seven RCTs met eligibility criteria. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for pain outcomes was − 1.01 (95% CI: −&#xa0;1.77 to − 0.25; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.00001), while quality of life showed an SMD of −&#xa0;0.57 (95% CI: 0.15 to 0.99; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). These results suggest that mindfulness meditation techniques are associated with significant improvements in pain reduction and enhanced quality of life compared to standard treatment. In contrast, the pooled SMD for physical function between mindfulness meditation and conventional therapy was 0.03 (95% CI: −&#xa0;0.98 to 1.04), indicating no strong evidence that mindfulness meditation improves physical function over standard interventions. Notably, there was substantial heterogeneity among studies (χ² = 369.89, df = 5, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; I² = 98.76%), likely due to variations in study design, sample populations, and intervention protocols in the mobility domain.</p> Conclusions <p>Mindfulness meditation is more effective than conventional treatments for reducing pain intensity and improving quality of life in CLBP, though it may not enhance physical function or mobility. Further studies should assess long-term outcomes and optimal delivery methods.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Effectiveness of mindfulness meditation on the quality of life, pain intensity, mobility and physical function in adults with chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月5日

查看全文
  • Sam Safavi-Abbasi,
  • Elisa Venezia,
  • Michael Sughrue,
  • Payam Dibaj

摘要

Objectives

To evaluate recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on mindfulness meditation in clinical settings to assess effects on pain reduction, mobility, quality of life, and physical function in patients with chronic lower-back pain (CLBP).

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a literature search was conducted using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) framework. Mindfulness meditation was compared to control or usual care. Data from RCTs published between January 2010 and January 2025 were extracted from Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Studies were selected following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines; risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2) tool. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan). Mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for outcomes such as pain intensity, physical function, and quality of life. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Forest plots summarized effect sizes, and funnel plots assessed publication bias.

Results

Of 204 identified citations, seven RCTs met eligibility criteria. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for pain outcomes was − 1.01 (95% CI: − 1.77 to − 0.25; p < 0.00001), while quality of life showed an SMD of − 0.57 (95% CI: 0.15 to 0.99; p < 0.001). These results suggest that mindfulness meditation techniques are associated with significant improvements in pain reduction and enhanced quality of life compared to standard treatment. In contrast, the pooled SMD for physical function between mindfulness meditation and conventional therapy was 0.03 (95% CI: − 0.98 to 1.04), indicating no strong evidence that mindfulness meditation improves physical function over standard interventions. Notably, there was substantial heterogeneity among studies (χ² = 369.89, df = 5, p < 0.001; I² = 98.76%), likely due to variations in study design, sample populations, and intervention protocols in the mobility domain.

Conclusions

Mindfulness meditation is more effective than conventional treatments for reducing pain intensity and improving quality of life in CLBP, though it may not enhance physical function or mobility. Further studies should assess long-term outcomes and optimal delivery methods.