Introduction <p>The global incidence of lung cancer is increasing, leading to a rise in the use of Robotic-assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) and a demand for more surgeons trained in robotic surgery. With the expanding number of robotic platforms, there is a need to train for a multiplatform environment. Therefore, a literature review was conducted using the PRISMA Scoping Review methodology to examine existing RATS curricula worldwide and identify the learning needs within these programs.</p> Methods <p>This work involves an exploration of the educational experiences of 73 existing thoracic surgical units, revealing common themes such as sequential training and progression through theoretical, simulation-based, and supervised/independent hands-on phases.</p> Results <p>The most frequently identified gaps include logistical barriers in the simulation phase and insufficient supervised or independent console time for trainees during the hands-on phase of their training.</p> Conclusion <p>This review has provided insight into the development of the RATS curriculum at the International Medical Robotics Academy, addressing these needs.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Current status and future directions of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery curriculum: a scoping review

  • Mohammadali Ahmadipour,
  • Jazmin Eckhaus,
  • Helen Mohan,
  • Anthony Costello,
  • Gavin Wright,
  • Cheng-Hon Yap

摘要

Introduction

The global incidence of lung cancer is increasing, leading to a rise in the use of Robotic-assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) and a demand for more surgeons trained in robotic surgery. With the expanding number of robotic platforms, there is a need to train for a multiplatform environment. Therefore, a literature review was conducted using the PRISMA Scoping Review methodology to examine existing RATS curricula worldwide and identify the learning needs within these programs.

Methods

This work involves an exploration of the educational experiences of 73 existing thoracic surgical units, revealing common themes such as sequential training and progression through theoretical, simulation-based, and supervised/independent hands-on phases.

Results

The most frequently identified gaps include logistical barriers in the simulation phase and insufficient supervised or independent console time for trainees during the hands-on phase of their training.

Conclusion

This review has provided insight into the development of the RATS curriculum at the International Medical Robotics Academy, addressing these needs.