Scholarlink

<p>This research investigates the paradoxical dual-use nature of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Africa’s anti-corruption efforts, where AI-enabled whistleblowing systems (AI-EWS) can serve either as empowering “algorithmic guardians” for citizens or as repressive “digital snitches” for the state. Through a comparative case study of South Africa, Kenya, and Ethiopia, and the development of a novel AI-Sousveillance-Paternalism (AI-SP) Framework—which synthesizes theories of sousveillance and technological paternalism—the study analyzes how a system’s orientation is configured by its architectural design, data governance, and institutional routing. Findings from document analysis and stakeholder interviews demonstrate that polycentric routing and transparent architecture, within conducive political environments, foster civic trust and bottom-up accountability (sousveillance). In contrast, opaque, centralized systems reinforce state control and paternalism. The study concludes that AI’s transformative potential for accountability operates as a catalytic amplifier of existing institutional dynamics rather than as an independent causal force. It offers critical design and policy principles centered on distributed trust, data sovereignty, and algorithmic transparency to ensure these technologies function as tools of public empowerment rather than instruments of repression.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The dual role of AI in whistleblowing systems for anti-corruption in Africa

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月20日

查看全文
  • Yelkal Mulualem Walle,
  • Birku Gedif Asifaw,
  • Haregot Abreha

摘要

This research investigates the paradoxical dual-use nature of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Africa’s anti-corruption efforts, where AI-enabled whistleblowing systems (AI-EWS) can serve either as empowering “algorithmic guardians” for citizens or as repressive “digital snitches” for the state. Through a comparative case study of South Africa, Kenya, and Ethiopia, and the development of a novel AI-Sousveillance-Paternalism (AI-SP) Framework—which synthesizes theories of sousveillance and technological paternalism—the study analyzes how a system’s orientation is configured by its architectural design, data governance, and institutional routing. Findings from document analysis and stakeholder interviews demonstrate that polycentric routing and transparent architecture, within conducive political environments, foster civic trust and bottom-up accountability (sousveillance). In contrast, opaque, centralized systems reinforce state control and paternalism. The study concludes that AI’s transformative potential for accountability operates as a catalytic amplifier of existing institutional dynamics rather than as an independent causal force. It offers critical design and policy principles centered on distributed trust, data sovereignty, and algorithmic transparency to ensure these technologies function as tools of public empowerment rather than instruments of repression.