<p>There have been many studies on “<InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="44007_2025_155_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathbb {Z}}_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>” harmonic functions, differential forms, or spinors recently, for example Donaldson (Q J Math 72:1–2, 2021), He (arXiv preprint, 2022), Taubes and Wu (Proceedings of Gökova geometry-topology conference 2018–2019, 2021; J Differ Geom 128(1), 379–462, 2024). It is then natural to ask what the most simple case is like: <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="44007_2025_155_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathbb {Z}}_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> harmonic functions on <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="44007_2025_155_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathbb {R}}^2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with point singularities? This paper focus on this issue. Unlike the more ambitious ongoing program of studying <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="44007_2025_155_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathbb {Z}}_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> harmonic functions <i>f</i> such that <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="44007_2025_155_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="58" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(|df| = 0 \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>d</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> on the singular locus <i>K</i> (see, for example, Donaldson (Q J Math 72:1–2, 2021) and He (arXiv preprint, 2022), this paper only requires |<i>df</i>| to have locally finite <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="44007_2025_155_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="19" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(L^2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi>L</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> norms near <i>K</i>, which means, |<i>df</i>| is allowed to be unbounded near <i>K</i>. To emphasize the difference and to reduce the confusion, we call them singular <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="44007_2025_155_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathbb {Z}}_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> harmonic functions. This paper studies singular <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="44007_2025_155_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathbb {Z}}_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> harmonic functions and finds its unexpected relationship with the polynomial Pell equation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Singular \({\mathbb {Z}}_2\) Harmonic Functions on \(\mathbb {R}^2\) and the Polynomial Pell’s Equation

  • Weifeng Sun

摘要

There have been many studies on “ \({\mathbb {Z}}_2\) Z 2 ” harmonic functions, differential forms, or spinors recently, for example Donaldson (Q J Math 72:1–2, 2021), He (arXiv preprint, 2022), Taubes and Wu (Proceedings of Gökova geometry-topology conference 2018–2019, 2021; J Differ Geom 128(1), 379–462, 2024). It is then natural to ask what the most simple case is like: \({\mathbb {Z}}_2\) Z 2 harmonic functions on \({\mathbb {R}}^2\) R 2 with point singularities? This paper focus on this issue. Unlike the more ambitious ongoing program of studying \({\mathbb {Z}}_2\) Z 2 harmonic functions f such that \(|df| = 0 \) | d f | = 0 on the singular locus K (see, for example, Donaldson (Q J Math 72:1–2, 2021) and He (arXiv preprint, 2022), this paper only requires |df| to have locally finite \(L^2\) L 2 norms near K, which means, |df| is allowed to be unbounded near K. To emphasize the difference and to reduce the confusion, we call them singular \({\mathbb {Z}}_2\) Z 2 harmonic functions. This paper studies singular \({\mathbb {Z}}_2\) Z 2 harmonic functions and finds its unexpected relationship with the polynomial Pell equation.