Scholarlink

<p>This study examines social participation as an ethical criterion for validating artificial intelligence (AI) tools in public administration, focusing on its role in fostering transparency and equity. An integrative review of 30 articles (2018–2024), analyzed the literature using Habermas’s communicative action and Rawls’s justice as fairness frameworks, supplemented by decolonial perspectives. The findings confirm that social participation is critical for mitigating algorithmic bias, enhancing transparency, and addressing inequalities in AI systems. However, practical implementation remains limited, with Global North perspectives dominating ethical guidelines and marginalizing Global South voices. This study proposes a hybrid governance model integrating rational dialogue and equity to legitimize AI in public administration. It advocates for digital deliberative forums to amplify marginalized communities and decolonial approaches to address digital and sociocultural disparities. Future research should employ longitudinal case studies and mixed methods to assess the impact of participation on AI ethics in diverse global contexts.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Social participation as an ethical criterion for AI governance in public administration

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月2日

查看全文
  • Lilian Linhares De Carvalho,
  • Felipe Buchbinder,
  • David Abraham Batista Da Hora,
  • Vinicius Bacelar Ferreira,
  • Diego Monteiro De Carvalho

摘要

This study examines social participation as an ethical criterion for validating artificial intelligence (AI) tools in public administration, focusing on its role in fostering transparency and equity. An integrative review of 30 articles (2018–2024), analyzed the literature using Habermas’s communicative action and Rawls’s justice as fairness frameworks, supplemented by decolonial perspectives. The findings confirm that social participation is critical for mitigating algorithmic bias, enhancing transparency, and addressing inequalities in AI systems. However, practical implementation remains limited, with Global North perspectives dominating ethical guidelines and marginalizing Global South voices. This study proposes a hybrid governance model integrating rational dialogue and equity to legitimize AI in public administration. It advocates for digital deliberative forums to amplify marginalized communities and decolonial approaches to address digital and sociocultural disparities. Future research should employ longitudinal case studies and mixed methods to assess the impact of participation on AI ethics in diverse global contexts.