Scholarlink

<p>The rapid evolution of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) presents profound ethical and theological challenges, particularly in military contexts where autonomous systems may assume life-and-death decision-making roles. This paper examines these implications through the theological lens of imago Dei (image of God), which emphasizes humanity's intrinsic dignity, moral accountability, and relational integrity. By analyzing the substantive, functional, and relational dimensions of imago Dei, the study critiques AGI's potential to depersonalize conflict, erode moral agency, and disrupt human relationality. The paper also addresses risks such as dehumanization, accountability gaps, and ethical ambiguities linked to weaponized AGI. To mitigate these risks, the paper proposes an ethical framework grounded in imago Dei principles. Key recommendations include prohibiting autonomous lethal decision-making, enforcing stringent human oversight, and restricting AGI applications to non-lethal, humanitarian contexts. Additionally, the framework advocates for international norms to govern AGI development, aligning technological advancements with principles of justice, compassion, and stewardship. This interdisciplinary study contributes to the global discourse on AI ethics by offering theological insights to ensure AGI fosters human flourishing and safeguards human identity amidst transformative technological change.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Safeguarding human identity: ethics and AGI in warfare

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月4日

查看全文
  • Latha Christie

摘要

The rapid evolution of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) presents profound ethical and theological challenges, particularly in military contexts where autonomous systems may assume life-and-death decision-making roles. This paper examines these implications through the theological lens of imago Dei (image of God), which emphasizes humanity's intrinsic dignity, moral accountability, and relational integrity. By analyzing the substantive, functional, and relational dimensions of imago Dei, the study critiques AGI's potential to depersonalize conflict, erode moral agency, and disrupt human relationality. The paper also addresses risks such as dehumanization, accountability gaps, and ethical ambiguities linked to weaponized AGI. To mitigate these risks, the paper proposes an ethical framework grounded in imago Dei principles. Key recommendations include prohibiting autonomous lethal decision-making, enforcing stringent human oversight, and restricting AGI applications to non-lethal, humanitarian contexts. Additionally, the framework advocates for international norms to govern AGI development, aligning technological advancements with principles of justice, compassion, and stewardship. This interdisciplinary study contributes to the global discourse on AI ethics by offering theological insights to ensure AGI fosters human flourishing and safeguards human identity amidst transformative technological change.