Scholarlink

<p>In 2009, the Brazilian School Feeding Program (PNAE) became the first national initiative worldwide to mandate that at least 30% of federal resources—previously spent on public tenders—be directed toward the direct procurement of food from family farmers. In Brazil, these producers are more likely to adopt environmentally sustainable agricultural practices and supply fresh foods. This policy, therefore, aimed to both improve students’ diet quality and strengthen local food systems through support for family farmers. Despite its ambition, the nationwide socioeconomic effects of this procurement reform remain overlooked. This paper aims to fill this gap by using an integrated economic modelling framework that combines a difference-in-differences model and an input‒output model. With the difference-in-differences model, we estimate the change in family and nonfamily farmer production value due to the modification in the PNAE procurement requirements. The input‒output model was used to assess the effects on employment and gross domestic product (GDP), with a representation of productive segments of family and nonfamily farming using information provided by the Brazilian Agricultural Census. Our findings indicate a positive socioeconomic effect of the program through improvements in employment and GDP. During the follow-up period, changes in PNAE food procurement policies generated a net increase of R$15 million (US$ 5 million) in GDP and approximately 24 thousand new jobs nationally. Most of the jobs and positive economic results were greater for family farmers, whose income increased by R$ 39 million (or approximately US$ 12 million). These gains can be attributed to the economic structure depicted in the estimated input‒output, which identified livestock family production as a labour-intensive economic segment. Economic modelling suggests that PNAE has the potential to promote more equitable economic development. Addressing the identified compliance problems in several municipalities could enhance the estimated effects. Improved monitoring and provision of technical support to both local school feeding programme managers and family farmers can increase compliance and contribute to the promotion of healthier, more equitable and sustainable food systems.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Socioeconomic effects of direct procurement from family farming in the Brazilian school feeding program

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月14日

查看全文
  • Thais Diniz Oliveira,
  • Paula Carvalho Pereda,
  • Lilian de Pellegrini Elias,
  • Ana Clara Duran

摘要

In 2009, the Brazilian School Feeding Program (PNAE) became the first national initiative worldwide to mandate that at least 30% of federal resources—previously spent on public tenders—be directed toward the direct procurement of food from family farmers. In Brazil, these producers are more likely to adopt environmentally sustainable agricultural practices and supply fresh foods. This policy, therefore, aimed to both improve students’ diet quality and strengthen local food systems through support for family farmers. Despite its ambition, the nationwide socioeconomic effects of this procurement reform remain overlooked. This paper aims to fill this gap by using an integrated economic modelling framework that combines a difference-in-differences model and an input‒output model. With the difference-in-differences model, we estimate the change in family and nonfamily farmer production value due to the modification in the PNAE procurement requirements. The input‒output model was used to assess the effects on employment and gross domestic product (GDP), with a representation of productive segments of family and nonfamily farming using information provided by the Brazilian Agricultural Census. Our findings indicate a positive socioeconomic effect of the program through improvements in employment and GDP. During the follow-up period, changes in PNAE food procurement policies generated a net increase of R$15 million (US$ 5 million) in GDP and approximately 24 thousand new jobs nationally. Most of the jobs and positive economic results were greater for family farmers, whose income increased by R$ 39 million (or approximately US$ 12 million). These gains can be attributed to the economic structure depicted in the estimated input‒output, which identified livestock family production as a labour-intensive economic segment. Economic modelling suggests that PNAE has the potential to promote more equitable economic development. Addressing the identified compliance problems in several municipalities could enhance the estimated effects. Improved monitoring and provision of technical support to both local school feeding programme managers and family farmers can increase compliance and contribute to the promotion of healthier, more equitable and sustainable food systems.