Scholarlink

<p>In recent decades, economic growth across Sub-Saharan Africa, fueled by resource extraction, industrial activity, and rapid urbanization, has brought significant gains in infrastructure and livelihoods. Yet, these advancements have come with serious environmental costs, including deforestation, water and soil degradation, and biodiversity decline. This paper uses the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) as a guiding framework to explore how development and environmental health interact over time. The EKC suggests that environmental harm tends to increase during the early stages of economic growth but may decrease as societies become more prosperous and capable of investing in sustainable practices. Despite contributing just 3.8% to global greenhouse gas emissions, countries in Sub-Saharan Africa bear the brunt of climate-related disruptions. Through a content analysis and coding of secondary sources, the paper examines how weak policy enforcement, poor governance, and limited institutional capacity undermine environmental protection. Case studies from Rwanda and Kenya offer glimpses of progress, showing how reforestation programs and clean energy investments can support ecological and economic goals. The findings highlight the value of green investment, regional collaboration, and local innovation in building more sustainable economies. Still, long-term progress will remain uneven without stronger enforcement systems and genuine community involvement. The paper reveals that accelerated economic activities have driven extensive ecological degradation, including annual deforestation rates exceeding 2.6% in countries like Ghana and emissions from extractive industries rising by over 35% in parts of Nigeria and South Africa. The paper is limited to reliance on secondary data and the absence of primary fieldwork, which may restrict the depth of contextual insights and recent developments in some countries. It argues for development strategies that are both environmentally responsible and rooted in inclusive, context-specific governance.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Nuances of economic development and environmental sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月1日

查看全文
  • Benjamin Damoah,
  • Richard Boglo

摘要

In recent decades, economic growth across Sub-Saharan Africa, fueled by resource extraction, industrial activity, and rapid urbanization, has brought significant gains in infrastructure and livelihoods. Yet, these advancements have come with serious environmental costs, including deforestation, water and soil degradation, and biodiversity decline. This paper uses the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) as a guiding framework to explore how development and environmental health interact over time. The EKC suggests that environmental harm tends to increase during the early stages of economic growth but may decrease as societies become more prosperous and capable of investing in sustainable practices. Despite contributing just 3.8% to global greenhouse gas emissions, countries in Sub-Saharan Africa bear the brunt of climate-related disruptions. Through a content analysis and coding of secondary sources, the paper examines how weak policy enforcement, poor governance, and limited institutional capacity undermine environmental protection. Case studies from Rwanda and Kenya offer glimpses of progress, showing how reforestation programs and clean energy investments can support ecological and economic goals. The findings highlight the value of green investment, regional collaboration, and local innovation in building more sustainable economies. Still, long-term progress will remain uneven without stronger enforcement systems and genuine community involvement. The paper reveals that accelerated economic activities have driven extensive ecological degradation, including annual deforestation rates exceeding 2.6% in countries like Ghana and emissions from extractive industries rising by over 35% in parts of Nigeria and South Africa. The paper is limited to reliance on secondary data and the absence of primary fieldwork, which may restrict the depth of contextual insights and recent developments in some countries. It argues for development strategies that are both environmentally responsible and rooted in inclusive, context-specific governance.