<p>The study is grounded in the Triple Bottom Line theory, which emphasizes three dimensions of accountability: environmental, social, and economic. However, the research on which the study is based argues that developing an effective framework for adopting the Circular Economy (CE) within the building sector requires a balanced consideration across four dimensions - environmental, social and economic, and technical - as the technical dimension plays a crucial role in the advancement of the CE concept. This complements previous research into the understanding of the CE concept in the building sector, further investigating these key dimensions that capture the evolution of CE research. Focusing specifically on the building sector, the research conducted a robust literature review examining the environmental, social, economic, and technical aspects associated with the CE concept. The aim of this was to identify existing barriers and gaps that prevent the successful adoption of a CE in the building sector. Insights derived from the literature review will then serve as the foundation for a new and comprehensive circular framework appropriate for the building sector. The research and study together thus underscore the importance of a four-dimensional, balanced framework for effectively implementing CE principles within the building sector.</p>