<p>Japan has significantly contributed to developing and less affluent countries through Official Development Assistance (ODA), fostering sustainable growth and international cooperation. Bangladesh is prominent among these countries since it receives substantial advantages from the Japanese ODA. While Bangladesh’s economic ascent is undeniable, its trajectory is hampered by a critical deficit of sustainable infrastructure. The study maintain that Japanese ODA has now emerged as a key, but a complicated, instrument in the solution of this paradox. Through the ODA system, Japan has contributed a significant amount to infrastructure building in Bangladesh, especially the hard infrastructure. We leave the bridges constructed and the megawatts produced behind and step into the chronicle of the Japan-Bangladesh infrastructure partnership. The key focus of the Japanese development assistance in Bangladesh is to develop the industrial infrastructures, minimize the trade and transacting costs, and also make investments at both national and international levels. Of interest to us is that, in particular, energy, transport, and industrial sectors, certain efforts are initiating certain physical infrastructure, but are also vigorously repositioning the geography of the Bangladesh economy and its sustenance capacity. The study evaluates the role the Japanese ODA played in the conception of the infrastructure development in Bangladesh and its general suitability to the economic performance of the state. Simultaneously, the research provides a clear-eyed examination of the implementation challenges, including geopolitical competition, administrative hurdles, and financial sustainability concerns that complicate this bilateral partnership. Ultimately, the paper offers a balance sheet of criticism in which the possibility of the transformative and sobering aspect of using international aid is evaluated with reference to long-term infrastructural transformation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Infrastructure sustainability in Bangladesh: the case of japanese official development assistance to ensure SDGs

  • Md Jahangir Alam,
  • S. M. Ali Reza,
  • Md Efrat Jahan Bhuiyan Shafin

摘要

Japan has significantly contributed to developing and less affluent countries through Official Development Assistance (ODA), fostering sustainable growth and international cooperation. Bangladesh is prominent among these countries since it receives substantial advantages from the Japanese ODA. While Bangladesh’s economic ascent is undeniable, its trajectory is hampered by a critical deficit of sustainable infrastructure. The study maintain that Japanese ODA has now emerged as a key, but a complicated, instrument in the solution of this paradox. Through the ODA system, Japan has contributed a significant amount to infrastructure building in Bangladesh, especially the hard infrastructure. We leave the bridges constructed and the megawatts produced behind and step into the chronicle of the Japan-Bangladesh infrastructure partnership. The key focus of the Japanese development assistance in Bangladesh is to develop the industrial infrastructures, minimize the trade and transacting costs, and also make investments at both national and international levels. Of interest to us is that, in particular, energy, transport, and industrial sectors, certain efforts are initiating certain physical infrastructure, but are also vigorously repositioning the geography of the Bangladesh economy and its sustenance capacity. The study evaluates the role the Japanese ODA played in the conception of the infrastructure development in Bangladesh and its general suitability to the economic performance of the state. Simultaneously, the research provides a clear-eyed examination of the implementation challenges, including geopolitical competition, administrative hurdles, and financial sustainability concerns that complicate this bilateral partnership. Ultimately, the paper offers a balance sheet of criticism in which the possibility of the transformative and sobering aspect of using international aid is evaluated with reference to long-term infrastructural transformation.