Scholarlink

<p>With the capabilities of facial recognition technology (FRT) expanding rapidly in recent years, regulations and policies guiding its use across political contexts are inconsistent and lack clarity. While certain artificial intelligence can help solve crime, for instance, the implications for ethics regarding privacy, bias, accuracy, and consent warrant considerable attention. This study compares the regulatory frameworks for facial recognition technology in criminal justice systems across five democratic countries, highlighting key differences and exploring their implications for privacy and civil liberties. Legal and regulatory responses vary significantly worldwide, emphasizing the need for updated laws tailored to address FRT's nuances. We compare regulations around three key dimensions: legal compliance, ethical alignment, and effectiveness in implementation and offer recommendations for an ethical framework addressing the development, deployment, and regulation of FRT systems.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Global perspectives on regulating facial recognition technology utilization for criminal justice arrests

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月12日

查看全文
  • Pedro Robles,
  • Daniel J. Mallinson,
  • Eric Best,
  • Cheryl Devaney,
  • Lauren Azevedo

摘要

With the capabilities of facial recognition technology (FRT) expanding rapidly in recent years, regulations and policies guiding its use across political contexts are inconsistent and lack clarity. While certain artificial intelligence can help solve crime, for instance, the implications for ethics regarding privacy, bias, accuracy, and consent warrant considerable attention. This study compares the regulatory frameworks for facial recognition technology in criminal justice systems across five democratic countries, highlighting key differences and exploring their implications for privacy and civil liberties. Legal and regulatory responses vary significantly worldwide, emphasizing the need for updated laws tailored to address FRT's nuances. We compare regulations around three key dimensions: legal compliance, ethical alignment, and effectiveness in implementation and offer recommendations for an ethical framework addressing the development, deployment, and regulation of FRT systems.