<p>In this paper, I ask if and how historians should use history writing as a form of political action, and what role historians should take in memory politics. In other words, what role should they play in the struggle over collective understandings of the past (Wang, <CitationRef CitationID="CR41">2018</CitationRef>, p. 43), increasingly mobilised as they are by political agents to achieve various political agenda (such as identity shaping, legitimising authority, etc.).I will take on this task by investigating J. G. A. Pocock’s (1924–2023) multiplicity of narratives in comparison with Liu Yizheng’s (柳詒徵, 1880–1956) virtue of historians. I argue that the political roles historians can assume are multifaceted, due to differences in regime types and in the notion of “politics”. However, empathy can be a political virtue that are beneficial for any political role historians may wish to assume with their history writing, regardless of regime types.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

How Do We Use History Writing as a Form of Political Action? From J. G. A. Pocock’s Multiplicity of Narratives to Liu Yizheng’s “Virtue of Historians” (shi de 史德)

  • Oscar Yuanbo Fu

摘要

In this paper, I ask if and how historians should use history writing as a form of political action, and what role historians should take in memory politics. In other words, what role should they play in the struggle over collective understandings of the past (Wang, 2018, p. 43), increasingly mobilised as they are by political agents to achieve various political agenda (such as identity shaping, legitimising authority, etc.).I will take on this task by investigating J. G. A. Pocock’s (1924–2023) multiplicity of narratives in comparison with Liu Yizheng’s (柳詒徵, 1880–1956) virtue of historians. I argue that the political roles historians can assume are multifaceted, due to differences in regime types and in the notion of “politics”. However, empathy can be a political virtue that are beneficial for any political role historians may wish to assume with their history writing, regardless of regime types.