Purpose <p>The purpose of this study was to compare the strength, length of selected muscles, and range of motion (ROM) of the upper quarter between people with and without upper crossed syndrome (UCS).</p> Methods <p>In this case–control study, 62 healthy females aged 30 to 42 were selected and equally divided into two groups, 31 people in the group of people with UCS and 31 people in the group of people without UCS, Forward head angle, rounded shoulder angle, kyphosis angle, strength, length of selected muscles and ROM of the upper quarter were measured in both groups. Data analysis was done with SPSS software version 26. Independent t and U-Mann–Whitney statistical tests were used to compare the variables at a significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) level.</p> Results <p>This study's findings are significant, revealing a clear distinction in the strength (<i>p</i> = 0.001), length (<i>p</i> = 0.001) of the selected muscles, and ROM of the upper quarter (<i>p</i> = 0.001) between individuals with and without UCS.</p> Conclusion <p>People with UCS differ from those without UCS in terms of muscle strength, length, and ROM. These results provide valuable insights into the impact of UCS on musculoskeletal health.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparison of Strength, Range of Motion, and Length of Selected Muscles Between People With and Without Upper Crossed Syndrome: A Case Control Study

  • Mitra Jamili,
  • Hashem Piri,
  • Rahman Sheikhhoseini,
  • Ebrahim Ebrahimi

摘要

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the strength, length of selected muscles, and range of motion (ROM) of the upper quarter between people with and without upper crossed syndrome (UCS).

Methods

In this case–control study, 62 healthy females aged 30 to 42 were selected and equally divided into two groups, 31 people in the group of people with UCS and 31 people in the group of people without UCS, Forward head angle, rounded shoulder angle, kyphosis angle, strength, length of selected muscles and ROM of the upper quarter were measured in both groups. Data analysis was done with SPSS software version 26. Independent t and U-Mann–Whitney statistical tests were used to compare the variables at a significant (p < 0.05) level.

Results

This study's findings are significant, revealing a clear distinction in the strength (p = 0.001), length (p = 0.001) of the selected muscles, and ROM of the upper quarter (p = 0.001) between individuals with and without UCS.

Conclusion

People with UCS differ from those without UCS in terms of muscle strength, length, and ROM. These results provide valuable insights into the impact of UCS on musculoskeletal health.