Background <p>Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries are uncommon in sport but may be career-defining for elite athletes. Controversy remains regarding indications for reconstruction, optimal techniques and the role of braced non-operative care. This narrative review summarises evidence on operative and non-operative management of PCL injuries in elite athletes, focusing on return-to-play (RTP), graft selection, reconstruction strategy and elite-specific considerations.</p> Methods <p>A narrative review was conducted in PubMed and Embase (inception-April 2025) with reference list screening. Clinical studies reporting return-to-play outcomes after operative or non-operative management of isolated PCL injuries and PCL-based MLKIs in athletic cohorts were prioritised; 51 studies were included, and heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis.</p> Results <p>Isolated PCL injuries in elite footballers are rare, whereas PCL-based multi-ligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are more common in collision sports. Early dynamic bracing with quadriceps-focused rehabilitation enables &gt; 90% RTP in selected acute isolated grade II–III tears in high-level athletic cohorts (Level III evidence). For chronic instability or MLKIs, anatomic single-bundle reconstruction remains common, with double-bundle and tibial inlay approaches offering biomechanical but limited clinical advantages. Modern elite MLKI cohorts report 80–90% RTP, though full return-to-performance is less frequent.</p> Conclusions <p>Management of elite PCL injuries requires individualised, sport-specific decision-making that balances biological healing with performance demands. High-quality, sport-specific outcome data remain limited.</p> <p>Level of Evidence</p> <p>Level V, narrative review.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Elite Athletes: A Narrative Review

  • Darby Amelia Elliott,
  • Chinmay Madhukar Gupte

摘要

Background

Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries are uncommon in sport but may be career-defining for elite athletes. Controversy remains regarding indications for reconstruction, optimal techniques and the role of braced non-operative care. This narrative review summarises evidence on operative and non-operative management of PCL injuries in elite athletes, focusing on return-to-play (RTP), graft selection, reconstruction strategy and elite-specific considerations.

Methods

A narrative review was conducted in PubMed and Embase (inception-April 2025) with reference list screening. Clinical studies reporting return-to-play outcomes after operative or non-operative management of isolated PCL injuries and PCL-based MLKIs in athletic cohorts were prioritised; 51 studies were included, and heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis.

Results

Isolated PCL injuries in elite footballers are rare, whereas PCL-based multi-ligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are more common in collision sports. Early dynamic bracing with quadriceps-focused rehabilitation enables > 90% RTP in selected acute isolated grade II–III tears in high-level athletic cohorts (Level III evidence). For chronic instability or MLKIs, anatomic single-bundle reconstruction remains common, with double-bundle and tibial inlay approaches offering biomechanical but limited clinical advantages. Modern elite MLKI cohorts report 80–90% RTP, though full return-to-performance is less frequent.

Conclusions

Management of elite PCL injuries requires individualised, sport-specific decision-making that balances biological healing with performance demands. High-quality, sport-specific outcome data remain limited.

Level of Evidence

Level V, narrative review.