Background <p>Opioid overprescription, especially after orthopedic surgery, contributes significantly to the ongoing opioid crisis. Despite limited benefit, opioids remain common for postoperative pain, increasing risks of addiction and adverse effects. Opioid-free (OF) analgesia offers a promising alternative. This meta-analysis examines the efficacy and safety of OF versus opioid-containing (OC) regimens for post-discharge orthopedic pain management.</p> Method <p>A systematic search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing OF versus OC analgesia after surgical discharge in orthopedic procedures. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed.</p> Results <p>13 RCTs involving 1,168 patients (588 OF, 580 OC) were included. The surgical procedures comprised arthroscopy (n = 5), hand and small joint surgery (n = 4), spine surgery (n = 2), extremity fracture repair (n = 1), and general ambulatory orthopedics (n = 1). Pain intensity, measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), showed no statistically significant difference between groups on Day 1 (SMD −0.40; 95% CI: −0.85–0.06; P = 0.086) or Day 3 (SMD −0.93; 95% CI: −1.87–0.02; P = 0.055). However, the OF group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in VAS scores on Days 4–7 (SMD −0.95; 95% CI: -1.88–−0.03; P = 0.043). Regarding adverse events, there was no significant difference in overall incidence (RR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.67–1.16; P = 0.377) or nausea/vomiting rates (RR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.47–1.13; P = 0.155). However, the OF regimen significantly reduced the risk of constipation (RR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.43–0.92; P = 0.015).</p> Conclusions <p>This meta-analysis suggests that, for the examined procedures (predominantly arthroscopy and hand surgery), opioid use at discharge offers no pain control advantage over OF regimens and may increase adverse events. These results support the broader adoption of multimodal OF strategies in these specific contexts, though future research must validate these protocols in major trauma and complex reconstruction surgeries while identifying optimal patient candidates.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Opioid-Free vs Opioid-Containing Regimens for Postoperative Pain Management After Orthopedic Surgery Discharge: A Meta-Analysis

  • Xinyi Guo,
  • Lei Feng,
  • Juan Han,
  • Lili Han

摘要

Background

Opioid overprescription, especially after orthopedic surgery, contributes significantly to the ongoing opioid crisis. Despite limited benefit, opioids remain common for postoperative pain, increasing risks of addiction and adverse effects. Opioid-free (OF) analgesia offers a promising alternative. This meta-analysis examines the efficacy and safety of OF versus opioid-containing (OC) regimens for post-discharge orthopedic pain management.

Method

A systematic search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing OF versus OC analgesia after surgical discharge in orthopedic procedures. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed.

Results

13 RCTs involving 1,168 patients (588 OF, 580 OC) were included. The surgical procedures comprised arthroscopy (n = 5), hand and small joint surgery (n = 4), spine surgery (n = 2), extremity fracture repair (n = 1), and general ambulatory orthopedics (n = 1). Pain intensity, measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), showed no statistically significant difference between groups on Day 1 (SMD −0.40; 95% CI: −0.85–0.06; P = 0.086) or Day 3 (SMD −0.93; 95% CI: −1.87–0.02; P = 0.055). However, the OF group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in VAS scores on Days 4–7 (SMD −0.95; 95% CI: -1.88–−0.03; P = 0.043). Regarding adverse events, there was no significant difference in overall incidence (RR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.67–1.16; P = 0.377) or nausea/vomiting rates (RR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.47–1.13; P = 0.155). However, the OF regimen significantly reduced the risk of constipation (RR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.43–0.92; P = 0.015).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggests that, for the examined procedures (predominantly arthroscopy and hand surgery), opioid use at discharge offers no pain control advantage over OF regimens and may increase adverse events. These results support the broader adoption of multimodal OF strategies in these specific contexts, though future research must validate these protocols in major trauma and complex reconstruction surgeries while identifying optimal patient candidates.