Scholarlink

Purpose <p>The relationship between skeletal maturity and postoperative growth modulation (GM) in patients treated with Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) is poorly understood. We aimed to: (1) identify preoperative skeletal maturity factors associated with GM, and (2) assess the relationship between GM and postoperative success in patients treated with VBT.</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively reviewed radiographic data from 55 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2&#xa0;years (2.6 ± 0.5). Changes in standing height and skeletal maturity (Sanders Stage [SS], Triradiate Cartilage [TRC], and Risser Stage [RS]) were assessed at all timepoints. Patients that exhibited GM were defined by ≥ 6° of deformity correction from first erect to any postoperative timepoint. Successful outcomes were defined by a Cobb Angle of ≤ 30° at latest follow-up.</p> Results <p>We observed GM in 42% (23 of 55) of patients. GM was influenced by SS (<i>p</i> = 0.017) and TRC (<i>p</i> = 0.013), but not RS (<i>p</i> = 0.104). We observed a successful outcome in 91% of patients that exhibited GM compared to 44% of those that did not (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; OR 12.9). No difference was identified in preoperative deformity magnitude or amount of initial correction achieved between patients that did and did not exhibit GM. Patients who exhibited GM had a higher revision rate (30.4%) than when compared to those who did not (3.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.005, OR 9.7).</p> Conclusion <p>Postoperative success after VBT is directly related to GM. Patients who modulate their deformity are 12.9 times more likely to exhibit a successful outcome and can be identified preoperatively based on SS or TRC.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Growth modulation increases clinical success in vertebral body tethering

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月15日

查看全文
  • Daniel G. Hoernschemeyer,
  • Samuel D. Hawkins,
  • Nicole M. Tweedy,
  • Melanie E. Boeyer

摘要

Purpose

The relationship between skeletal maturity and postoperative growth modulation (GM) in patients treated with Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) is poorly understood. We aimed to: (1) identify preoperative skeletal maturity factors associated with GM, and (2) assess the relationship between GM and postoperative success in patients treated with VBT.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed radiographic data from 55 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years (2.6 ± 0.5). Changes in standing height and skeletal maturity (Sanders Stage [SS], Triradiate Cartilage [TRC], and Risser Stage [RS]) were assessed at all timepoints. Patients that exhibited GM were defined by ≥ 6° of deformity correction from first erect to any postoperative timepoint. Successful outcomes were defined by a Cobb Angle of ≤ 30° at latest follow-up.

Results

We observed GM in 42% (23 of 55) of patients. GM was influenced by SS (p = 0.017) and TRC (p = 0.013), but not RS (p = 0.104). We observed a successful outcome in 91% of patients that exhibited GM compared to 44% of those that did not (p < 0.001; OR 12.9). No difference was identified in preoperative deformity magnitude or amount of initial correction achieved between patients that did and did not exhibit GM. Patients who exhibited GM had a higher revision rate (30.4%) than when compared to those who did not (3.0%, p = 0.005, OR 9.7).

Conclusion

Postoperative success after VBT is directly related to GM. Patients who modulate their deformity are 12.9 times more likely to exhibit a successful outcome and can be identified preoperatively based on SS or TRC.