<p>In 1951 paper Kippenhahn conjectured that if the characteristic polynomial <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(P_A(x_1,x_2,x_3)=\text{ det }(x_1A_1+x_2A_2-x_3I),\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mi>A</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mspace width="0.333333em" /> <mtext>det</mtext> <mspace width="0.333333em" /> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>+</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>-</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msub> <mi>I</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> where <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(A_1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(A_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> are <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n\times n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>×</mo> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> Hermitian matrices, has a repeated factor in the polynomial ring <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\mathbb {C}}}[x_1,x_2,x_3],\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mi> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> then the pair <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((A_1,A_2)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is unitary equivalent to a direct sum <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((C_1\oplus C_2, \ D_1\oplus D_2)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>⊕</mo> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="4pt" /> <msub> <mi>D</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>⊕</mo> <msub> <mi>D</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> where <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(C_i, D_i\in M_{n_i}({{\mathbb {C}}}) \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>D</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mo>∈</mo> <msub> <mi>M</mi> <msub> <mi>n</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for some <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(1\le n_i&lt;n, \ n_1+n_2=n, i=1,2.\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>≤</mo> <msub> <mi>n</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="4pt" /> <msub> <mi>n</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>+</mo> <msub> <mi>n</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>i</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> Kippenhahn verified the conjecture whenever the degree of the minimal polynomial of <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(x_1A_1 + x_2A_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>+</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is 1 or 2. In subsequent 1982 works Shapiro obtained a number of results which supported the conjecture. In particular, she showed that it held if <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n \le 5.\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>≤</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> In 1983 Laffey showed that, in general, Kippenhahn’s conjecture was not true by constructing a counterexample for <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n=8.\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>8</mn> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> Since then additional counterexamples were worked out. Some positive results in this direction including the quantum version of the conjecture were established as well. In this paper we use methods of recently developed local spectral analysis to give some necessary and sufficient conditions for the affirmative answer to Kippenhahn’s conjecture in terms of the characteristic polynomials of certain elements of the algebra generated by the matrices in the tuple.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Kippenhahn’s conjecture revisited

  • Michael Stessin

摘要

In 1951 paper Kippenhahn conjectured that if the characteristic polynomial \(P_A(x_1,x_2,x_3)=\text{ det }(x_1A_1+x_2A_2-x_3I),\) P A ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) = det ( x 1 A 1 + x 2 A 2 - x 3 I ) , where \(A_1\) A 1 and \(A_2\) A 2 are \(n\times n\) n × n Hermitian matrices, has a repeated factor in the polynomial ring \({{\mathbb {C}}}[x_1,x_2,x_3],\) C [ x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ] , then the pair \((A_1,A_2)\) ( A 1 , A 2 ) is unitary equivalent to a direct sum \((C_1\oplus C_2, \ D_1\oplus D_2)\) ( C 1 C 2 , D 1 D 2 ) where \(C_i, D_i\in M_{n_i}({{\mathbb {C}}}) \) C i , D i M n i ( C ) for some \(1\le n_i<n, \ n_1+n_2=n, i=1,2.\) 1 n i < n , n 1 + n 2 = n , i = 1 , 2 . Kippenhahn verified the conjecture whenever the degree of the minimal polynomial of \(x_1A_1 + x_2A_2\) x 1 A 1 + x 2 A 2 is 1 or 2. In subsequent 1982 works Shapiro obtained a number of results which supported the conjecture. In particular, she showed that it held if \(n \le 5.\) n 5 . In 1983 Laffey showed that, in general, Kippenhahn’s conjecture was not true by constructing a counterexample for \(n=8.\) n = 8 . Since then additional counterexamples were worked out. Some positive results in this direction including the quantum version of the conjecture were established as well. In this paper we use methods of recently developed local spectral analysis to give some necessary and sufficient conditions for the affirmative answer to Kippenhahn’s conjecture in terms of the characteristic polynomials of certain elements of the algebra generated by the matrices in the tuple.