Scholarlink

<p>This study compares four predicted models of histidine acid phosphatase (HAP) from <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> generated using SWISS-MODEL, YASARA, AlphaFold2, and DMFold. Structural validation revealed that AlphaFold2 and DMFold had the highest ERRAT values (92.711 and 92.955, respectively), with AlphaFold2 demonstrating the best Ramachandran plot results (90.2% of residues in favored regions). Molecular docking indicated that DMFold formed 16 hydrogen bonds with phytic acid, the most among the models, and exhibited the strongest docking score (-6.9&#xa0;kcal/mol). YASARA was the only model to depict critical catalytic interactions between His59, Asp322, and phytic acid. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations demonstrated that SWISS-MODEL exhibited the highest structural stability, with the lowest RMSD (1.664328 ± 0.12&#xa0;Å), Rg (33.2908 ± 0.61&#xa0;Å), and SASA (51,908.99 ± 135.92 Å<sup>2</sup>), while DMFold displayed the most flexibility. Binding energy analysis revealed that DMFold had the strongest binding affinity ( – 89.2612 ± 2.93&#xa0;kJ/mol), followed by YASARA ( – 122.101 ± 11.25&#xa0;kJ/mol). Despite DMFold’s superior binding, YASARA is considered the most functionally accurate due to its depiction of the correct catalytic interactions.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A comparative investigation of predicted protein structures of a histidine acid phosphatase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae through molecular docking and MD simulations

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年1月18日

查看全文
  • Nima Ghahremani Nezhad,
  • Mostafa Yousefzadeh Borzehandani,
  • Azadeh Eskandari,
  • Raja Noor Zaliha Raja Abd Rahman,
  • Normi Mohd Yahaya,
  • Siti Nurbaya Oslan,
  • Fairolniza Mohd Shariff,
  • Adam Leow Thean Chor

摘要

This study compares four predicted models of histidine acid phosphatase (HAP) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae generated using SWISS-MODEL, YASARA, AlphaFold2, and DMFold. Structural validation revealed that AlphaFold2 and DMFold had the highest ERRAT values (92.711 and 92.955, respectively), with AlphaFold2 demonstrating the best Ramachandran plot results (90.2% of residues in favored regions). Molecular docking indicated that DMFold formed 16 hydrogen bonds with phytic acid, the most among the models, and exhibited the strongest docking score (-6.9 kcal/mol). YASARA was the only model to depict critical catalytic interactions between His59, Asp322, and phytic acid. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations demonstrated that SWISS-MODEL exhibited the highest structural stability, with the lowest RMSD (1.664328 ± 0.12 Å), Rg (33.2908 ± 0.61 Å), and SASA (51,908.99 ± 135.92 Å2), while DMFold displayed the most flexibility. Binding energy analysis revealed that DMFold had the strongest binding affinity ( – 89.2612 ± 2.93 kJ/mol), followed by YASARA ( – 122.101 ± 11.25 kJ/mol). Despite DMFold’s superior binding, YASARA is considered the most functionally accurate due to its depiction of the correct catalytic interactions.