Scholarlink

<p>During the construction of small-spacing tunnels, blasting operations in the following tunnel may induce cracking and spalling in the lining structure of the preceding tunnel. This issue is particularly pronounced in large-section tunnels. Therefore, this study employs the peak particle velocity (PPV) as an evaluation index to investigate the influence zones and rational clear spacings for large-section tunnels with small clear distances under different surrounding rock conditions. Based on the findings, key design parameters for damping holes are proposed for scenarios where the required rational clear spacing cannot be achieved, and the effectiveness of these measures is validated through test sections. The main conclusions are as follows: For Grade III, IV, and V surrounding rock conditions, the rational clear spacings for large-section tunnels with small clear distances are 0.76D, 1.00D, and 1.29D, respectively. When the actual tunnel spacing is less than or falls below these values, the tunnel structure may become unstable. Furthermore, damping holes can effectively reduce vibration velocity. More effective vibration reduction can be achieved when the diameter of the damping holes exceeds 6&#xa0;cm, the spacing between holes is less than 15&#xa0;cm, the distance from the damping holes to the blasting source is greater than 1.5&#xa0;m, and the number of rows of damping holes is more than two.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Blasting construction influence zone and damping hole parameter optimization in large-section neighborhood tunnels with small-spacing

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月4日

查看全文
  • Dajian Li,
  • Kaicheng Zhu,
  • Yuxuan Han,
  • Huayun Li,
  • Hao Bai

摘要

During the construction of small-spacing tunnels, blasting operations in the following tunnel may induce cracking and spalling in the lining structure of the preceding tunnel. This issue is particularly pronounced in large-section tunnels. Therefore, this study employs the peak particle velocity (PPV) as an evaluation index to investigate the influence zones and rational clear spacings for large-section tunnels with small clear distances under different surrounding rock conditions. Based on the findings, key design parameters for damping holes are proposed for scenarios where the required rational clear spacing cannot be achieved, and the effectiveness of these measures is validated through test sections. The main conclusions are as follows: For Grade III, IV, and V surrounding rock conditions, the rational clear spacings for large-section tunnels with small clear distances are 0.76D, 1.00D, and 1.29D, respectively. When the actual tunnel spacing is less than or falls below these values, the tunnel structure may become unstable. Furthermore, damping holes can effectively reduce vibration velocity. More effective vibration reduction can be achieved when the diameter of the damping holes exceeds 6 cm, the spacing between holes is less than 15 cm, the distance from the damping holes to the blasting source is greater than 1.5 m, and the number of rows of damping holes is more than two.