Scholarlink

<p>Several forms of illusory understanding in science are identified by Shiffrin et al. (2026). We focus on one they emphasize: the illusion that predictive success implies causal insight. Their diagnosis, we argue, lacks a criterion for when incomplete understanding becomes illusory, conflating predictions that warrant confidence with those that do not. We propose that what separates warranted confidence from illusion is not causal completeness but the risk structure of the prediction: whether the model could have failed had the hypothesis been wrong. The question shifts from “how complete is the causal story?” to “how severe was the test?”.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Prediction, Risk, and Illusion

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月20日

查看全文
  • Kenny Yu,
  • Maria M. Robinson

摘要

Several forms of illusory understanding in science are identified by Shiffrin et al. (2026). We focus on one they emphasize: the illusion that predictive success implies causal insight. Their diagnosis, we argue, lacks a criterion for when incomplete understanding becomes illusory, conflating predictions that warrant confidence with those that do not. We propose that what separates warranted confidence from illusion is not causal completeness but the risk structure of the prediction: whether the model could have failed had the hypothesis been wrong. The question shifts from “how complete is the causal story?” to “how severe was the test?”.