<p>This article approaches learning as a phenomenon that unfolds within lived temporality rather than administrative sequence. Time appears not as a neutral schedule but as a shifting field in which breath, posture, light, sound, and relational climate gather into moments of understanding. Drawing on two years of hybrid ethnographic and physiological observation in Vietnamese schools and community learning settings, the study reads field encounters as disclosures of temporal negotiation. Across sites, a recurrent tension emerged: bodies incline toward endogenous tempos while institutional rhythms press toward uniform coordination. Engaging phenomenological accounts of embodiment and vernacular orientations to cyclical time, the article develops a biotemporal ontology in which cognition takes shape as rhythmic alignment among body, environment, and task. Physiological traces and affective gestures are interpreted not as indicators of performance but as signs of how presence is sustained or thinned. The argument reframes educational temporality as an ethical question of livability, suggesting that schooling becomes inhabitable only where lived time can gather and release without penalty.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Temporal Life of Learning: Rhythmic Embodiment and the Question of Presence

  • Tran Quoc Viet

摘要

This article approaches learning as a phenomenon that unfolds within lived temporality rather than administrative sequence. Time appears not as a neutral schedule but as a shifting field in which breath, posture, light, sound, and relational climate gather into moments of understanding. Drawing on two years of hybrid ethnographic and physiological observation in Vietnamese schools and community learning settings, the study reads field encounters as disclosures of temporal negotiation. Across sites, a recurrent tension emerged: bodies incline toward endogenous tempos while institutional rhythms press toward uniform coordination. Engaging phenomenological accounts of embodiment and vernacular orientations to cyclical time, the article develops a biotemporal ontology in which cognition takes shape as rhythmic alignment among body, environment, and task. Physiological traces and affective gestures are interpreted not as indicators of performance but as signs of how presence is sustained or thinned. The argument reframes educational temporality as an ethical question of livability, suggesting that schooling becomes inhabitable only where lived time can gather and release without penalty.