<p>We present unified <i>w</i>-theoretic characterizations of Prüfer <i>v</i>-multiplication domains (P<i>v</i>MDs). A module-theoretic perspective shows that torsion submodules are <i>w</i>-pure, and for (<i>w</i>-) finitely generated modules <i>M</i>, the canonical sequence <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(0\rightarrow T(M)\rightarrow M\rightarrow M/T(M)\rightarrow 0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>0</mn> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mi>T</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>M</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mi>M</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mi>M</mi> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mi>T</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>M</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> <i>w</i>-splits, resolving an open question of Geroldinger–Loper–Kim. In a <i>w</i>-version of Hattori–Davis theory, these conditions are equivalent to <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{Tor}^R_2(M,N)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mtext>Tor</mtext> <mn>2</mn> <mi>R</mi> </msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>M</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> being <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{GV}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mtext>GV</mtext> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-torsion for all <i>R</i>-modules <i>M</i>,&#xa0;<i>N</i>, equivalently <i>w</i>-w.gl.dim<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((R)\le 1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>R</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>≤</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, or <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{Tor}^R_1(X,A)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mtext>Tor</mtext> <mn>1</mn> <mi>R</mi> </msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>X</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>A</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> being <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{GV}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mtext>GV</mtext> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-torsion for all <i>X</i> and torsion-free <i>A</i>, or the Davis map <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(A\otimes _R B \rightarrow \mathcal {T}\otimes _K \mathcal {S}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <msub> <mo>⊗</mo> <mi>R</mi> </msub> <mi>B</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">T</mi> <msub> <mo>⊗</mo> <mi>K</mi> </msub> <mi mathvariant="script">S</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> having <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{GV}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mtext>GV</mtext> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-torsion kernel. From an overring viewpoint, <i>R</i> is a P<i>v</i>MD if and only if for every <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(R\subseteq T\subseteq K\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mo>⊆</mo> <mi>T</mi> <mo>⊆</mo> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and every <i>w</i>-maximal ideal <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathfrak {m}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">m</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the localization <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(R_{{\mathfrak {m}}}\rightarrow T_{{\mathfrak {m}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">m</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">m</mi> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a flat epimorphism, so that each overring is <i>w</i>-flat and the inclusion is <i>w</i>-epimorphic. Finally, <i>R</i> is a P<i>v</i>MD if and only if every pure <i>w</i>-injective divisible <i>R</i>-module is injective.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Module-Theoretic Characterizations of Prüfer v-Multiplication Domains

  • Xiaolei Zhang,
  • Hwankoo Kim

摘要

We present unified w-theoretic characterizations of Prüfer v-multiplication domains (PvMDs). A module-theoretic perspective shows that torsion submodules are w-pure, and for (w-) finitely generated modules M, the canonical sequence \(0\rightarrow T(M)\rightarrow M\rightarrow M/T(M)\rightarrow 0\) 0 T ( M ) M M / T ( M ) 0 w-splits, resolving an open question of Geroldinger–Loper–Kim. In a w-version of Hattori–Davis theory, these conditions are equivalent to \(\textrm{Tor}^R_2(M,N)\) Tor 2 R ( M , N ) being \(\textrm{GV}\) GV -torsion for all R-modules MN, equivalently w-w.gl.dim \((R)\le 1\) ( R ) 1 , or \(\textrm{Tor}^R_1(X,A)\) Tor 1 R ( X , A ) being \(\textrm{GV}\) GV -torsion for all X and torsion-free A, or the Davis map \(A\otimes _R B \rightarrow \mathcal {T}\otimes _K \mathcal {S}\) A R B T K S having \(\textrm{GV}\) GV -torsion kernel. From an overring viewpoint, R is a PvMD if and only if for every \(R\subseteq T\subseteq K\) R T K and every w-maximal ideal \({\mathfrak {m}}\) m , the localization \(R_{{\mathfrak {m}}}\rightarrow T_{{\mathfrak {m}}}\) R m T m is a flat epimorphism, so that each overring is w-flat and the inclusion is w-epimorphic. Finally, R is a PvMD if and only if every pure w-injective divisible R-module is injective.