<p>In this paper, we consider the following Kirchhoff–Schrödinger system in <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathbb {R}}^3\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mn>3</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>: where <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(a_1, a_2, b_1, b_2, \lambda \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>b</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>b</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <mi>λ</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> are positive constants and <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>μ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a nonnegative constant. In the case where the potentials are constant functions, the second author of the current paper proved that this system admits a positive ground state solution when <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(3&lt;p\le q&lt;6\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>≤</mo> <mi>q</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>6</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>(subcritical case) and <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(3&lt;p&lt;q=6\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>q</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>6</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>(critical case) by using Nehari–Pohozaev manifold. In this paper we extend the result to the nonconstant potential case, that is, under certain assumptions on <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(V_1(x), V_2(x)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\lambda ,\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>λ</mi> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> we prove that this problem has a nontrivial ground state solution. The main ingredients of the proof are Jeanjean’s monotonicity trick and the global compactness lemma. In particular, we will show that when <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>μ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is sufficiently large, the global compactness lemma is valid even in the critical case.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Existence of ground state solutions to Kirchhoff–Schrödinger system for subcritical and critical cases with nonconstant potentials in \({\mathbb {R}}^3\)

  • Hiroshi Matsuzawa,
  • Tatsuya Ueno

摘要

In this paper, we consider the following Kirchhoff–Schrödinger system in \({\mathbb {R}}^3\) R 3 : where \(a_1, a_2, b_1, b_2, \lambda \) a 1 , a 2 , b 1 , b 2 , λ are positive constants and \(\mu \) μ is a nonnegative constant. In the case where the potentials are constant functions, the second author of the current paper proved that this system admits a positive ground state solution when \(3<p\le q<6\) 3 < p q < 6 (subcritical case) and \(3<p<q=6\) 3 < p < q = 6 (critical case) by using Nehari–Pohozaev manifold. In this paper we extend the result to the nonconstant potential case, that is, under certain assumptions on \(V_1(x), V_2(x)\) V 1 ( x ) , V 2 ( x ) and \(\lambda ,\) λ , we prove that this problem has a nontrivial ground state solution. The main ingredients of the proof are Jeanjean’s monotonicity trick and the global compactness lemma. In particular, we will show that when \(\mu \) μ is sufficiently large, the global compactness lemma is valid even in the critical case.