<p>Defining ‘rationality’ as the choice of best elements according to an ordering is unnecessarily restrictive. In the present paper, we accept a broader definition of rationality by first including purposive choices even if they are not restricted to best elements and then second, by allowing rational individuals to have reflexive, connected and acyclic preferences. This paper provides a complete characterization for choice functions, where <i>k</i>th best elements are chosen according to a reflexive, connected and acyclic binary relation for <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(k \ge 2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Acyclic k-rationalization of a choice function: a characterization

  • Taposik Banerjee

摘要

Defining ‘rationality’ as the choice of best elements according to an ordering is unnecessarily restrictive. In the present paper, we accept a broader definition of rationality by first including purposive choices even if they are not restricted to best elements and then second, by allowing rational individuals to have reflexive, connected and acyclic preferences. This paper provides a complete characterization for choice functions, where kth best elements are chosen according to a reflexive, connected and acyclic binary relation for \(k \ge 2\) k 2 .