<p>We report the experimental cross sections for the <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{61}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>61</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Ni(<InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\gamma\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>,<i>xp</i>) reaction in the <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E_\gamma\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mi>γ</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> range of 25–28 MeV, obtained using the surrogate reaction ratio method with the <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{59}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>59</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Co(<InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\gamma\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>,<i>xp</i>) reaction as a reference. The desired and reference compound nuclei <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{61}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>61</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Ni<InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^*\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mo>∗</mo> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{59}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>59</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Co<InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^*\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mo>∗</mo> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> were produced via the transfer reactions <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{59}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>59</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Co(<InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^6\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>6</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Li,<InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>α</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) and <InlineEquation ID="IEq19"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{57}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>57</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Fe(<InlineEquation ID="IEq20"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^6\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>6</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Li,<InlineEquation ID="IEq21"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>α</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), respectively. The measured results are compared with predictions from the evaluated photonuclear data libraries (<span>tendl-2023</span>, <span>kaeri</span>, and <span>jendl-5.0</span>) and with Hauser-Feshbach model calculations using the <span>talys-2.0</span> code. The <span>tendl-2023</span> and <span>jendl-5.0</span> evaluations tend to underestimate the experimental cross sections; however, the <span>kaeri</span> predictions match the measured values within the associated uncertainties. The <span>talys</span> calculations, employing nuclear-level densities from Hilaire’s combinatorial tables and photon strength functions derived from the Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov approach, reproduce the experimental data well. These findings indicate that the <span>kaeri</span> evaluation is the most reliable for cross-section predictions for the <InlineEquation ID="IEq22"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{61}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>61</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Ni(<InlineEquation ID="IEq23"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\gamma\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>,<i>xp</i>) channel and highlight the need to reassess the modeling assumptions in <span>tendl-2023</span> and <span>jendl-5.0</span>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Photonuclear 61Ni(γ, xp) cross-section measurement using surrogate reactions

  • Ramandeep Gandhi,
  • S. Santra,
  • P. C. Rout,
  • A. Pal,
  • A. Baishya,
  • T. Santhosh,
  • D. Chattopadhyay,
  • K. Ramachandran,
  • G. Mohanto,
  • Jyoti Pandey,
  • Nishant Kumar,
  • Rudrajyoti Palit

摘要

We report the experimental cross sections for the \(^{61}\) 61 Ni( \(\gamma\) γ ,xp) reaction in the \(E_\gamma\) E γ range of 25–28 MeV, obtained using the surrogate reaction ratio method with the \(^{59}\) 59 Co( \(\gamma\) γ ,xp) reaction as a reference. The desired and reference compound nuclei \(^{61}\) 61 Ni \(^*\) and \(^{59}\) 59 Co \(^*\) were produced via the transfer reactions \(^{59}\) 59 Co( \(^6\) 6 Li, \(\alpha\) α ) and \(^{57}\) 57 Fe( \(^6\) 6 Li, \(\alpha\) α ), respectively. The measured results are compared with predictions from the evaluated photonuclear data libraries (tendl-2023, kaeri, and jendl-5.0) and with Hauser-Feshbach model calculations using the talys-2.0 code. The tendl-2023 and jendl-5.0 evaluations tend to underestimate the experimental cross sections; however, the kaeri predictions match the measured values within the associated uncertainties. The talys calculations, employing nuclear-level densities from Hilaire’s combinatorial tables and photon strength functions derived from the Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov approach, reproduce the experimental data well. These findings indicate that the kaeri evaluation is the most reliable for cross-section predictions for the \(^{61}\) 61 Ni( \(\gamma\) γ ,xp) channel and highlight the need to reassess the modeling assumptions in tendl-2023 and jendl-5.0.