<p>This paper explores the impact of back-gate bias (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41365_2025_1730_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="25" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(V_\text {soi}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mtext>soi</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) and supply voltage (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41365_2025_1730_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="29" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(V_\text {DD}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mtext>DD</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) on the single-event upset (SEU) cross section of 0.18&#xa0;µm configurable silicon-on-insulator static random-access memory (SRAM) under high linear energy transfer heavy-ion experimentation. The experimental findings demonstrate that applying a negative back-gate bias to NMOS and a positive back-gate bias to PMOS enhances the SEU resistance of SRAM. Specifically, as the back-gate bias for N-type transistors (<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41365_2025_1730_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="32" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(V_\text {nsoi}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mtext>nsoi</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) decreases from 0 to −10&#xa0;V, the SEU cross section decreases by 93.23%, whereas an increase in the back-gate bias for P-type transistors (<InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41365_2025_1730_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="32" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(V_\text {psoi}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mtext>psoi</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) from 0 to 10&#xa0;V correlates with an 83.7% reduction in SEU cross section. Furthermore, a significant increase in the SEU cross section was observed with increase in supply voltage, as evidenced by a 159% surge at <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41365_2025_1730_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="29" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(V_\text {DD}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mtext>DD</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 1.98&#xa0;V compared with the nominal voltage of 1.8&#xa0;V. To explore the physical mechanisms underlying these experimental data, we analyzed the dependence of the critical charge of the circuit and the collected charge on the bias voltage by simulating SEUs using technology computer-aided design.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Back-gate bias and supply voltage dependency on the single-event upset susceptibility of 6 T CSOI-SRAM

  • Li-Wen Yao,
  • Jin-Hu Yang,
  • Yu-Zhu Liu,
  • Bo Li,
  • Yang Jiao,
  • Shi-Wei Zhao,
  • Qi-Yu Chen,
  • Xin-Yu Li,
  • Tian-Qi Wang,
  • Fan-Yu Liu,
  • Jian-Tou Gao,
  • Jian-Li Liu,
  • Xing-Ji Li,
  • Jie Liu,
  • Pei-Xiong Zhao

摘要

This paper explores the impact of back-gate bias ( \(V_\text {soi}\) V soi ) and supply voltage ( \(V_\text {DD}\) V DD ) on the single-event upset (SEU) cross section of 0.18 µm configurable silicon-on-insulator static random-access memory (SRAM) under high linear energy transfer heavy-ion experimentation. The experimental findings demonstrate that applying a negative back-gate bias to NMOS and a positive back-gate bias to PMOS enhances the SEU resistance of SRAM. Specifically, as the back-gate bias for N-type transistors ( \(V_\text {nsoi}\) V nsoi ) decreases from 0 to −10 V, the SEU cross section decreases by 93.23%, whereas an increase in the back-gate bias for P-type transistors ( \(V_\text {psoi}\) V psoi ) from 0 to 10 V correlates with an 83.7% reduction in SEU cross section. Furthermore, a significant increase in the SEU cross section was observed with increase in supply voltage, as evidenced by a 159% surge at \(V_\text {DD}\) V DD = 1.98 V compared with the nominal voltage of 1.8 V. To explore the physical mechanisms underlying these experimental data, we analyzed the dependence of the critical charge of the circuit and the collected charge on the bias voltage by simulating SEUs using technology computer-aided design.