<p>In his scholarly work, Friedrich Gundolf pursues such an extensive apologetics of rhythm that, in its ubiquity, rhythm risks losing its conceptional base, thus dissolving time and again a&#xa0;rigid opposition between meter and rhythm. In contrast, Gundolf’s own parodistic poetry –&#xa0;by refusing its objects any kind of rhythmic adaptation&#xa0;– can be understood as an attempt at redefining the boundary between meter and rhythm.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Barometer oder Witterung?

  • Claude Haas

摘要

In his scholarly work, Friedrich Gundolf pursues such an extensive apologetics of rhythm that, in its ubiquity, rhythm risks losing its conceptional base, thus dissolving time and again a rigid opposition between meter and rhythm. In contrast, Gundolf’s own parodistic poetry – by refusing its objects any kind of rhythmic adaptation – can be understood as an attempt at redefining the boundary between meter and rhythm.