<p>Integrating CO<sub>2</sub> capture into combined heat and power (CHP) plants reduces heat and electricity generation. Heat pumps (HPs) can be utilized to recover waste heat for solvent regeneration or district heating (DH). However, no study compares different ways of utilizing recovered heat. Therefore, this study evaluated the performance of a HP-integrated CHP plant with CO<sub>2</sub> capture. Four cases were considered, Case 1 (reference case 1): without CO<sub>2</sub> capture; Case 2 (reference case 2): with CO<sub>2</sub> capture and no HPs; Case 3: with CO<sub>2</sub> capture and using HPs to recover heat for DH; and Case 4: with CO<sub>2</sub> capture and using HPs to recover heat for solvent regeneration. Using real operating data from a waste-fired CHP plant (50 MW<sub>e</sub>, 110 MW<sub>th</sub>), results demonstrated that, in Case 2 (cf. Case 1), maximum 81.6% of CO<sub>2</sub> was captured at a cost of 62.6% reduction in net electricity generation. In Case 3, 45.3% of the DH demand was covered by HP recovered heat, amounting 375.8 GWh/year. In Case 4, 78.3% of the heat required for CO<sub>2</sub> capture was supplied by HP recovered heat, reaching 445.1 GWh/year. While 90% of CO<sub>2</sub> was captured in Cases 3 and 4, the annual net electricity generation was reduced by 64.5% and 37.1%, respectively. Additionally, given current carbon trading prices, CO<sub>2</sub> capture was not economically feasible and that system’s internal heat recovery by HPs is not economically feasible, either.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Integrating heat pumps into CHP plants to support CO2 capture

  • Shuo Wang,
  • Beibei Dong,
  • Hedén Sandberg Anton,
  • Eva Thorin,
  • Cuiping Ma,
  • Qie Sun,
  • Hailong Li

摘要

Integrating CO2 capture into combined heat and power (CHP) plants reduces heat and electricity generation. Heat pumps (HPs) can be utilized to recover waste heat for solvent regeneration or district heating (DH). However, no study compares different ways of utilizing recovered heat. Therefore, this study evaluated the performance of a HP-integrated CHP plant with CO2 capture. Four cases were considered, Case 1 (reference case 1): without CO2 capture; Case 2 (reference case 2): with CO2 capture and no HPs; Case 3: with CO2 capture and using HPs to recover heat for DH; and Case 4: with CO2 capture and using HPs to recover heat for solvent regeneration. Using real operating data from a waste-fired CHP plant (50 MWe, 110 MWth), results demonstrated that, in Case 2 (cf. Case 1), maximum 81.6% of CO2 was captured at a cost of 62.6% reduction in net electricity generation. In Case 3, 45.3% of the DH demand was covered by HP recovered heat, amounting 375.8 GWh/year. In Case 4, 78.3% of the heat required for CO2 capture was supplied by HP recovered heat, reaching 445.1 GWh/year. While 90% of CO2 was captured in Cases 3 and 4, the annual net electricity generation was reduced by 64.5% and 37.1%, respectively. Additionally, given current carbon trading prices, CO2 capture was not economically feasible and that system’s internal heat recovery by HPs is not economically feasible, either.