<p>In 1836 Sturm published two papers in Liouville’s J. Math. Pures et Appl., giving his famous comparison and oscillation theorems. In its simplest form, Sturm’s comparison result is Theorem <i>Let </i><InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40863_2025_491_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="97" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(q_1(x) \le q_2(x)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>q</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>≤</mo> <msub> <mi>q</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> <i>be not identically equal on</i> [<i>a</i>,&#xa0;<i>b</i>]. <i>Let </i><i>u</i> <i>be a nontrivial solution to </i><InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40863_2025_491_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="113" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(u'' + q_1(x)u = 0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msup> <mi>u</mi> <mrow> <mo>′</mo> <mo>′</mo> </mrow> </msup> <mo>+</mo> <msub> <mi>q</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> <i>on </i>[<i>a</i>,&#xa0;<i>b</i>], <i>and let </i><i>v</i> <i>be a nontrivial solution to</i> <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40863_2025_491_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="112" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(v''+ q_2(x)v = 0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msup> <mi>v</mi> <mrow> <mo>′</mo> <mo>′</mo> </mrow> </msup> <mo>+</mo> <msub> <mi>q</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi>v</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> <i>on </i>[<i>a</i>,&#xa0;<i>b</i>]. <i>Suppose that </i><InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40863_2025_491_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="118" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(u(a)=u(b) =0.\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>a</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>b</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> <i>Then </i><i>v</i> <i>has at least one zero in</i> (<i>a</i>,&#xa0;<i>b</i>). One may ask if there is a discrete version of this. There is, where the second derivative operator is replaced by the usual finite difference approximation, as has been observed by many people. Furthermore, it continues to hold for more general tri-diagonal operators. The second derivative operator may also be approximated by a discretization which includes next nearest neighbor interactions. Does the above theorem hold for such penta-diagonal operators? Not in general, as we show by example. In another direction, being the main point of this paper, one can replace the second derivative operator by an integral operator, bounded or unbounded, resulting in a nonlocal diffusion-like operator. Can one prove a similar comparison theorem? Here we discuss the case where <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40863_2025_491_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="15" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(u''\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi>u</mi> <mrow> <mo>′</mo> <mo>′</mo> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is replaced by <Equation ID="Equ50"> <MediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40863_2025_491_Article_Equ50.gif" Format="GIF" Height="40" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="246" /> </MediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\begin{aligned} Lu:= \int J(x-y)[u(y)-u(x)]dy, \end{aligned}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="right"> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mo>:</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mo>∫</mo> <mi>J</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> <mi>d</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>where <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40863_2025_491_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="43" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(J\ge 0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>J</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is continuous, even, with compact support and <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40863_2025_491_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="63" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(J(0)&gt;0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>J</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. After this, we discuss the case when the nonlocal diffusion operator is replaced by a scaled version <Equation ID="Equ51"> <MediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40863_2025_491_Article_Equ51.gif" Format="GIF" Height="43" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="305" /> </MediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\begin{aligned} L_{\epsilon }u:= \int _\Omega \frac{1}{{\epsilon }^{n+2}}J\left(\frac{x-y}{{\epsilon }}\right)[u(y)-u(x)]dy, \end{aligned}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="right"> <mrow> <msub> <mi>L</mi> <mi>ϵ</mi> </msub> <mi>u</mi> <mo>:</mo> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mo>∫</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> </msub> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <msup> <mrow> <mi>ϵ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mfrac> <mi>J</mi> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <mfrac> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>y</mi> </mrow> <mi>ϵ</mi> </mfrac> </mfenced> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>for <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40863_2025_491_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="13" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="39" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\epsilon }&gt;0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and small, and where <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40863_2025_491_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="55" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega \subset \mathbb {R}^n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> <mo>⊂</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is smoothly bounded, and <i>J</i> is radially symmetric. This operator converges, in some sense, to a multiple of the Laplacian, as <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40863_2025_491_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="43" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\epsilon }\rightarrow 0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and so the question arises as to whether or not a Sturm-like comparison theorem holds with this&#xa0;nonlocal diffusion operator.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Sturm comparison for nonlocal equations

  • Peter W. Bates,
  • Guangyu Zhao

摘要

In 1836 Sturm published two papers in Liouville’s J. Math. Pures et Appl., giving his famous comparison and oscillation theorems. In its simplest form, Sturm’s comparison result is Theorem Let \(q_1(x) \le q_2(x)\) q 1 ( x ) q 2 ( x ) be not identically equal on [ab]. Let u be a nontrivial solution to \(u'' + q_1(x)u = 0\) u + q 1 ( x ) u = 0 on [ab], and let v be a nontrivial solution to \(v''+ q_2(x)v = 0\) v + q 2 ( x ) v = 0 on [ab]. Suppose that \(u(a)=u(b) =0.\) u ( a ) = u ( b ) = 0 . Then v has at least one zero in (ab). One may ask if there is a discrete version of this. There is, where the second derivative operator is replaced by the usual finite difference approximation, as has been observed by many people. Furthermore, it continues to hold for more general tri-diagonal operators. The second derivative operator may also be approximated by a discretization which includes next nearest neighbor interactions. Does the above theorem hold for such penta-diagonal operators? Not in general, as we show by example. In another direction, being the main point of this paper, one can replace the second derivative operator by an integral operator, bounded or unbounded, resulting in a nonlocal diffusion-like operator. Can one prove a similar comparison theorem? Here we discuss the case where \(u''\) u is replaced by \(\begin{aligned} Lu:= \int J(x-y)[u(y)-u(x)]dy, \end{aligned}\) L u : = J ( x - y ) [ u ( y ) - u ( x ) ] d y , where \(J\ge 0\) J 0 is continuous, even, with compact support and \(J(0)>0\) J ( 0 ) > 0 . After this, we discuss the case when the nonlocal diffusion operator is replaced by a scaled version \(\begin{aligned} L_{\epsilon }u:= \int _\Omega \frac{1}{{\epsilon }^{n+2}}J\left(\frac{x-y}{{\epsilon }}\right)[u(y)-u(x)]dy, \end{aligned}\) L ϵ u : = Ω 1 ϵ n + 2 J x - y ϵ [ u ( y ) - u ( x ) ] d y , for \({\epsilon }>0\) ϵ > 0 and small, and where \(\Omega \subset \mathbb {R}^n\) Ω R n is smoothly bounded, and J is radially symmetric. This operator converges, in some sense, to a multiple of the Laplacian, as \({\epsilon }\rightarrow 0\) ϵ 0 , and so the question arises as to whether or not a Sturm-like comparison theorem holds with this nonlocal diffusion operator.