<p>For <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40840_2025_1963_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="96" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(0&lt;\lambda , \ \alpha &lt;1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>0</mn> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>λ</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="4pt" /> <mi>α</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, let <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40840_2025_1963_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="55" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {U(\alpha ,\lambda )}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">U</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>α</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>λ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> be a sub-class of non-Bazilevič functions defined by <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40840_2025_1963_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="33" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="198" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\left| f^{\prime }(z)\left( z/f(z)\right) ^{\alpha +1}-1\right| &lt;\lambda \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mfenced close="|" open="|"> <msup> <mi>f</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>z</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <msup> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <mi>z</mi> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>z</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mfenced> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mfenced> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>λ</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In this article, we present the bounds on <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40840_2025_1963_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="86" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(||a_{3}|-|a_{2}||\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>a</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for Taylor’s coefficients for the functions in the class <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40840_2025_1963_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="55" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {U(\alpha ,\lambda )}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">U</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>α</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>λ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We also establish the same bounds for the inverse, logarithmic and logarithmic inverse coefficients. All bounds presented in this paper are sharp.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

On the Difference of Coefficients of Class \(\mathcal {U(\alpha ,\lambda )}\)

  • Umar Raza,
  • Mohsan Raza

摘要

For \(0<\lambda , \ \alpha <1\) 0 < λ , α < 1 , let \(\mathcal {U(\alpha ,\lambda )}\) U ( α , λ ) be a sub-class of non-Bazilevič functions defined by \(\left| f^{\prime }(z)\left( z/f(z)\right) ^{\alpha +1}-1\right| <\lambda \) f ( z ) z / f ( z ) α + 1 - 1 < λ . In this article, we present the bounds on \(||a_{3}|-|a_{2}||\) | | a 3 | - | a 2 | | for Taylor’s coefficients for the functions in the class \(\mathcal {U(\alpha ,\lambda )}\) U ( α , λ ) . We also establish the same bounds for the inverse, logarithmic and logarithmic inverse coefficients. All bounds presented in this paper are sharp.